I'm proud to be incompatible with Apple
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
480 points (96.3% liked)
Greentext
8298 readers
1423 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
My Mac studio m2 was the only computer I ever had that had compatibility issues with some USB cables
People talk about Apple hardware like it's incredible, but honestly, no pc manufacturer would make that mistake
load more comments
(4 replies)
What's rather ironic is my Linux FOSS setup is more compatible than ever because it can open my students .notes and .pages files, while MS Word couldn't.
And naturally, I'm proud of using FOSS so I guess I'm proud to be compatible with everything.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Skill issue. I have LocalSend on all my devices.
Reportedly Quickshare is now compatible with airdrop. I'm 0 for 1 right now. Could have been a skill issue. I was using hotspot at the time, which apparently interferes.
I believe it only works for a small subset of Pixel devices. At least for now.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(33 replies)
Remember folks, apple onyl has usb c because they were forced to
They were forced to have one, they were not forced to remove everything else.
That is solely on them.
Malicious compliance
fuck apple but you're kinda mistaken here, if you're talking about just iphone, maybe you're right - but they had usb c (actually thunderbolt) on macbook and ipad before any legal rulings, macbooks before there was even any hint of legislation iirc.
They may be talking about micro usb 3.0 that was basically usb-c before the physical plug was developed. It was a micro usb with a really stupid additional plug bonded to it to make it high power and I think gave extra data lanes. Lighting plug was probably apples counter to that ungodly sin upto the tech universe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Connector_USB_3_IMGP6033_wp.jpg
yeah i have an external ssd that uses that weird clamshell connector, you can actually just plug in a regular micro B and it works with usb 2.0 speeds
lightning was basically a better version of the micro-b connector, it debuted with the iPhone 5 in 2012, it had a few advantages over micro-B including a reversible connector. back when it came out apple users complained because all the accessories used the old 30-pin connector so they weren't compatible, so apple pledged to not change the iPhone connector again for a long time, iirc 10 years? i think that's why iPhones were still using lightning until 2023 despite having usb C on the macbook since 2016
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(8 replies)
In apple's defense, they wanted a reversible high speed connector, but the USB committee in their infinite wisdom was like "what if we added a tumor to the micro USB instead?"
load more comments
(2 replies)
Hey remember that tried and true universal plug-in that literally works on everything and everybody loves? Lets not have that anymore.
I know Apple is terrible with usability, but I also think USB-C is now the one that works everywhere. All my last USB stick purchases had USB-A and C, just so that I don't have to run away in tears. I can even use them with smartphones and those never had USB-A.
It's the new standard, but there should always be at least one USB-A. It's still incredibly common.
USB-C is over 11 years old.
And? Is there something newer that's a standard? If not, it's the new one.
Also, it's only recently become the de facto standard. Yes, it's older than that, but it didn't become the standard until maybe five years ago. So much was still being made for USB-A, and some things still are. Anything older than ~5 years ago has good odds of being A.
Anything older than 5 years ago has the odds of being A, B, Mini A, Mini B, Micro A, Micro B, etc.
C is the standard. If you need legacy support, there’s hubs and adapters. No need to perpetuate legacy ports. I’d love a serial and a parallel connector - there’s plenty of modern industrial gear still using them. But we do that with C -> Serial adapters.
A device has a limited number of ports. Would one rather two USB-C, or one A and one C?
That A port will have diminishing value if one intends to use the device for 5 to 10 years and increases the probability someone discards the device early given the limited number of modern, high value ports.
I don't have a single peripheral that uses USB-C. I have a lot of USB-A and some micro-USB.
My phone is USB-C and that's about it. Given that my 2 year old PC case has 8 USB-A connectors and 1 USB-C connector, I'd also wager keyboards and mice won't stop being USB-A anytime soon. There's just no reason for them to be anything else.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
People do not replace accessories and specialized external hardware nearly as often as companies think they do.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I think the only holdouts are Raspberry Pi. For some reason they still don't have a USB-C option for the nano
Both USB-C and USB-A have their pros and cons.
-
USB-C has a lot more bandwidth and power draw.
-
USB-A is sturdier and cheaper.
For things like a mouse or keyboard, having more bandwidth or power draw are useless, but being cheaper and sturdier are not.
One can not replace the other entirely. Apple just wants to milk everyone by forcing them to buy all their peripherals again.
load more comments
(30 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)