this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
819 points (99.8% liked)

196

6350 readers
2445 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, but what that doesn't tell you is that if you actually walk that, you won't be alive at the end of the day anymore and with transit you have at least a standing chance, if you try hard.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

/—\_ vs ____

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Multiple times I've seen NIMBYs vote down light rails and other public transit options. They'll talk about taxes and traffic, but it always boils down to them not wanting "undesirables" having access to their amenities.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

They still want them to commute in to clean their houses though. Or perhaps live in the servant barracks on the estate.

[–] fitjazz@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 6 hours ago

Saves 1% gas

Thanks google.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 57 points 1 day ago (6 children)

In Europe I'd take that bet. In America, I'd rather be stuck waiting 3+ hours for public transport than walk along unprotected highways where I could just be knocked down for existing

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or being bothered by police for walking in a car only zone.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

When my husband and I were broke undergrads, we did a lot of walking around our mid-sized college town. We made our way to some pretty non-pedestrian-friendly places in our wanderings.

Police officers stopped to ask if we were having car trouble or needed a ride on a weekly basis. (Obvs, we're white, which is why we were met with the benefit of the doubt from the local officers instead of suspicion.)

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

Really depends on the details. The delay in public transport is probably waiting for a connection - if it's somewhere pleasant where I can catch lunch/breakfast, then probably take public transport. If I'm on vacation and the walk is through a historic part of town or a scenic hike then probably walk.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mech@feddit.org 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Yeah, but also Google Maps sucks massive donkey balls for finding public transit routes.
There's probably a much faster connection available if you use your public transit's own website.

[–] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 66 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is again a US only issue I'm afraid. It works great in Europe and Japan.

[–] mech@feddit.org 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Maybe it changed, but last time I tried it it didn't work well in Germany.
Granted, our public transport system is pretty complicated.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

It didn't work well in Germany when I arrived in Europe six years ago, but for the last three or so years it's been quite good.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I use it daily an overall it's better than the DB or my local network's app.

Sometimes it's wrong so I use both. Where it shines is telling me how to get to the right stop and steig. For some reason neither German app will tell me what steig I need and it is a pain.

[–] terminatortwo@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It really does suck in Germany. At least in Berlin, Citymapper is the bees knees!

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I stopped using them when they removed their promise not to sell user data from their privacy policy. I also didn't feel great about using a closed source service anyway.

Now I use a combination of Öffi and Organic Maps.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

What? You must not live in the US as it's pretty good, especially cities. Feels more like a "US sucks" response, which I totally get but doesn't make it valid. Try getting a public transit option from Google somewhere like Belize or Guatemala, and then you have a complaint.

[–] kartoffelsaft@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where I am (seattle), google maps and the king county metro site give the same routes and information. Almost feels like they're talking to the same API considering it gives the same time down to the minute.

[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I use this app called Transit. Same data, but if any data is missing, it’s crowdsourced by people on the bus using the app.

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 5 points 1 day ago

that's because king county literally uses google and google maps to provide transit maps and routing information.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's absolutely fine in the Netherlands.

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nowhere as optimal as 9292 though. And for walking and bicycling, OpenStreetMaps or Komoot or Tourtje are better as well than that Americrap. The latter two are annoying in that you need to make an account, though.

On top of that, all those I mentioned are much less data hungry than G**gle Maps.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Google Maps works fairly well for most US public transit. Mostly because there isn’t much of it; so it’s not hard for them to maintain it. 😉

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Ha! Got you Europeans! It was all part of the plan, we INTENTIONALLY chose worse public transit, so we can have accurate Google map routes!

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

It used to be better but Google being Google they keep killing their good services

[–] homik@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

That's of course more likely the said public transit site sucking at providing an API that works. But yeah, for a user that can be a good lpt.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] renzhexiangjiao@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Michal@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)
  • time spent looking for parking, and time spent walking from the car to the actual destination
[–] Noobnarski@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the broken part in a lot of the areas of the US, there is so much parking that you will always find a spot easily and everyone no matter which mode of transit needs to spend time to cross the giant parking lot because that's what is between the road and the store for example.

I'm lucky I don't live there and only whitnessed the hostility of the infrastructure towards everyone not in a car when I was visiting on holiday.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also include horrific externalized costs from cars.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Yep, my comment of 25 minutes completely omits the costs, just talking about time.

The externalized costs of owning a car (and most USians don't even care for their vehicles as well as they should) are immense.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not an issue if you avoid downtown.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

It depends where you live. I'm in Europe, and in my case driving to a park (im suburbs, not downtown) with my son was 10min, and cycling was twice as long but with a bike we could go directly to the playground, which was 15 min walk from the park entrance (including taking out the stroller etc) . So, while google maps showed me 10 vs 20 min, i learned it's faster to actually just cycle there.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get the point, but I'd still rather a 3.5 hour train ride with transfers than a 3.5 hour walk.

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Funny thing is I'm the opposite, so long as it's OKish weather. I prefer the reliability and flexibilty (and exercise).

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah walking for a portion may be a good option. If there's no long wait for transit for this trip, there's a chance you miss a transfer, and have to walk anyways.

[–] Beehaw_Girl@beehaw.org 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep for the added cost of just one more minute I would totally opt for the more exercise healthier option. But three and a half hours is a heckuva a long time for either option.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Plus I can usually walk faster than the maps projection - I think I’d take it as a personal challenge

[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago

something something freedom i think. its your choice... umm... have it your way--no wait thats burger king...

whatever- takes bus and arrives in 20 mins

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Jesus Christ I'm in the US and it isn't like that here. Where is that? That's ridiculous.

[–] xylol@leminal.space 2 points 5 hours ago

Thats how it is for me since you have to take multiple buses or the train then bus from home to work. I had planned on taking the train like I used to but since work moved a bit, the tracks sort of start to drift away from the location of my job, so Id have to then take some buses. the worst part is the earliest train is about an hour after I like to be at work, and the last train home would mean I wouldnt be able to work a full 8 hour shift before Id have to leave to catch the bus to get to the station

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Probably a route with connections (waiting time and walking)

It's still so unacceptably bad in most places that this circumstance isn't unbelievable

[–] espurr@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

YABA DABA DOOOOOOOO

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Looks like London buses at rush hour

load more comments
view more: next ›