this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
244 points (99.6% liked)

politics

25872 readers
3481 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump in an interview with NBC News Sunday, confirmed that he plans to attend an unusual meeting organized by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that will gather hundreds of senior military officers near Washington on Tuesday.

Hegseth last week summoned hundreds of senior military leaders, who are stationed all over the world, to Washington for a meeting of the Pentagon’s top brass.

Senior admirals and generals were not informed beforehand about the purpose of the meeting.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Could have been an email

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Wouldn’t they know better than he would?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 108 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here comes the Hitler Oath

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 32 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Oddly enough, I just learned today apparently Hitler didn't demand the German military to swear an oath, two Generals came up with the idea to have the military swear to Hitler in hopes of drawing him away from the Nazi Party. Which clearly didn't work as they planned.

After this article, with this other knowledge, I would be willing to bet that shits going to get REAL fucky.

If they ask these officers to commit high treason then that's it. The military is there to protect constitution. With no military to protect it, no court to uphold it, no congress to abide it then the United States is truly over. (Though I still maintain that was April 15, 2025).

There's a tiny, tiny, tiny possibility that we are too pessimistic and that maybe they do mean "they'd die for the country." They could simply recite the oath theyve already sworn, and be completely legally protected.

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God

Trump, and Hegseth, aren't men of honor. They seen honor as a joke, a weakness. Nonsense. To me that appears to be expected from them, as honor requires empathy, which they lack.

The question then becomes do our senior officers have empathy?

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean honor, empathy, tradition... all of that, on a personal level are technically a weakness in a head to head competition. Saturday morning cartoons lied, cheaters do win. But on a larger scale than one person, and longer time span than one day or even decade, they give a group a significant advantage. Trump et all only care about themselves and the very near future. That is why thier statements resonate with a fair number of people who care only about the same.

And that's kind of why I bring it up.

This isn't an individual level thing. It sounds like they intend to make it one.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

two Generals came up with the idea to have the military swear to Hitler in hopes of drawing him away from the Nazi Party.

I don't understand this... is there a typo here or is my brain just malfunctioning?

I'm an engineer not an English major, but I don't think there are typos.

But it is a really fucking weird thing to read and hurts my brain too. Apparently the story that Hitler demanded the oath was started amongst draftees, which makes sense as it's the guy you're swearing an oath to.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But according to their oat, they could take care of Trump, who is clearly a domestic enemy to the constitution.

Yeah. If honor, integrity, empathy mean anything to them. That's the part I'm worried about.

They're not corporate machines at least?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have that marked as when Due Process was eliminated

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 109 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah that’s a lot of HVT in one area.

But that aside, I wouldn’t be super shocked if this turns into loyalty pledge-a-palooza. Which would be… interesting.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The OPSEC incompetence is staggering, but he's an idiot who failed in basic operational security multiple times so should we be surprised?

maybe, but you can be sure that all elevators will work fine (maybe they'll even disable any safety measures just to be "safe")

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 45 points 2 days ago

I will pray for a military coup on Tuesday

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 34 points 1 day ago

This is more sounding like asking for a loyalty oath to trump.

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago

It almost seems like a setup to pledge fealty just one day before the government shuts down. But of course, it's common practice to pull 800 generals and admirals from their global stations and place them in a single room in front of Trump.

[–] Kurious84@lemmings.world 70 points 1 day ago

Ah there it is. Kiss the ring.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

So they do plan to have the generals swear an oath on him personally...

[–] Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

I’m sure Trump admin is doing bigly good militarily

God blesh the United Shesh

de-doop-oohh eating the dogs

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lets hope the real patriots have the guts to do the right thing.

Narrator - they didn't

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Great, so they'll have TWO unqualified hacks with little (Hegseth) to no (Trump) military experience telling them how they're doing their jobs wrong.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's also the (honestly pretty unlikely) possibility of the highest ranking fragging in US history

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You know, it dawned on me now, this seems like a risk to National Security.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I dunno... those generals might do the right thing for the country and remove trump.

You'd like to think so. But if open my history book... Here it is! This exact thing happened before and the generals gladly abandoned their previous oaths, only to find about two third of themselves on the wrong end of the muzzle when they were no longer necessary.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It could be a turning point in history

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 day ago

Well they will be making generals to swear an oath to him, so of course he wants to be present.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 26 points 1 day ago

It will be hard for all of those high-ranking military members to ignore how utterly incompetent Hegseth and Trump are. Not that they shouldn't know already, but having it on display right in front of you and having the opportunity to discuss it with other people you respect in person will be a whole other thing.

Of course there will be crazies that support this administration, but I am hopeful this will be a good way for the sane to gain some solidarity on the need to be ready to terf these morons when there are illegal orders.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 23 points 1 day ago

So the planned 1 hour speech will now become a 5 hour rambling orangefest.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When is the hostile invasion of Portland?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

enough with the Portlish jokes

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

And he’ll be introducing an hour-long presentation by Stretchface Barbie on the exciting opportunity of time-shares in the greater Miami area.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

What a ripe target!

…yes Master Putin. Thy will be done!