this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
33 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

4090 readers
252 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No pics of text

Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vegan_Joe@anarchist.nexus 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If the conifer trees are so prone to fire damage that they require millions of acres of glyphosate to help them recover, maybe it's time to let more fire-hardy species replenish instead.

The area has historically been populated by fire-hardy species in the past. Why not return it to a more natural cycle, especially now that it's being exacerbated by increasingly erratic weather systems?

*Edit: I just checked, and...Oh no... the conifers are the fire-hardy species. They've been in California surviving fire cycles for 50 million years.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A diversity of species isn't the only thing that leads to fire prevention, what is also required is a diversity of age in trees. A stand of the same species of tree at the exact same age is vulnerable to everything including forest fires, it is the maximally unstable position to place a forest in.

[–] Vegan_Joe@anarchist.nexus 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That further reinforces the complexity of intervention strategies, rather than just spraying glyphosate on everything...