this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
447 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

88098 readers
4798 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah I had a mild panic before realising that I haven't actually used aur for anything yet

[–] jason@discuss.online 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So, I'm totally fine because I always manually install from the AUR? This is more of a problem for people using those AUR helpers that make a package manager out of it, right?

[–] KssioAug@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

No. If it came from AUR, it doesnt matter the method you used. You should check all the AUR apps you recently updated (from 9th to 12th June), and compare it to the lists. Only AUR though... Arch official repos are not affected by it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I only ever access the AUR in an Arch distrobox... The containerization should protect me right?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (15 children)

Expecting user to inspect install scripts is retarded. And this is the result.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] goatinspace@feddit.org -1 points 3 months ago (5 children)
[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It's a sandbox in the sense that it is a box to keep the sand in one place under normal circumstances. It was never intended to completely prevent sand from being ejected by an unruly child inside of it. Or perfectly keep outside toys from being brought into it if someone tries to do that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›