this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
418 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

85574 readers
4372 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"So what did you do with the $100,000?"

"I invested it and turned it into sixteen THOUSAND dollars. "

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

First thing I thought of lmao.

load more comments (2 replies)

Do you know how to make a small fortune with AI?

First, start with a big fortune...

[–] artyom@piefed.social 76 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 45 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Looks like the shovel seller is making quite a bit

[–] artyom@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago

Indeed, they're the only ones. Along with Samsung, SK Hynix, AMD, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow, I like that "spent since page load".

I want a ticker like that "Lemmy pages since bong load".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is interesting. Nvidia cashing in while they can. They'll come back to us consumers when/if all this AI stuff collapses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is what you call a succesful business man /s

[–] skankhunt42@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

If someone gave me 21billion I bet I could only lose 1 billion, return the 20, and never be seen again.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago

This was standard operating procedure for Silicon Valley companies before COVID.

[–] ScruffyDucky@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (5 children)

You have to spend money to make money :)

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Are you serious? You don't know much about this if you think that's what's going on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sometimes you have to spend more than you make but that doesn't mean it's a bad idea! You just have to continue spending and one day it'll maybe start turning a profit. Maybe not, though! 🙂 I love AI

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are you being facetious or are you just dumb?

[–] ScruffyDucky@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Neither. It was very nice of frunch@lemmy.world to make an effort and explain my comment in his response. Sometimes things might not be as simple as you think so please keep an open mind. Thank you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

They're being facetious but it's actually what AI investors are thinking. AI can lose money until it's the only AI company left then they can charge whatever they want.

I had an AI engineer tell me that hallucinations are actually AI having original thoughts. Zzzzz

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 22 hours ago

Wtf, these folk s are clinically insane. It'd be funny if they weren't literally fucking over the entire world in the process.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 404found@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Clear Channel aka Iheartradio (the media conglomerate) went a whole decade consistently losing money before they finally made a profit. If we follow that timeline then OpenAI has 9 more years to hemorrhage money before they start to see a return of investment.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Except that, over those 10+ years, iheartradio accumulated less than half of the debt that OpenAI already has.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Talking total debt is somewhat meaningless.

The important number is the ratio between their loss and their revenue.

i.e. the convenience store down the street could operate at a loss before turning profitable, and accumulate far less than half the debt of iHeartRadio, but that doesn't mean the convenience store is the better long term investment. When it turns a profit, it's potential profit is far smaller than iHeartRadio's was.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 22 hours ago

Don't know about iheartradio but OpenAI's 3:1 ratio for 2026 does not bode well. That's without considering therir future operational commitments, which are quite high.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Both of these companies are an example of a new kind of capitalist trick where they simply take advantage of the fact that they can use an infinite amount of money to invade a market and make it completely unprofitable for any competition by losing money for years.

They can then acquire all of these companies' market share and then squeeze everyone with their new monopoly powers.

It's blatant market manipulation that any country with a functioning government would have regulated out of existence.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is another incorrect take. OpenAI is not the only one hemorraging money. All of these LLM companies are offering a heavily subsidized product. Once the money runs out, which it will, the bubble wil pop or deflate. It's not a matter of "if", just "when". It's simply not an economically viable product. My guess is that the only reason they're doing this, is because they're hoping for some wild technological breakthrough that will massively lower costs.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

An incorrect take?

This isn't a business strategy unique to tech companies, it's used across multiple different industries.

Source: work in finance.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, an incorrect take.

While the strategy is not new, the scale and speed is. Also, there wasn't an existing market that they're trying to capture (as opposed to services like Amazon or Uber).

The entire industry is doing the same thing and they're all losing. It's a race to the bottom and that is most certainly new (and stupid).

Not to mention that the cost of the unsubsidized product is insane. Hence, it's not an economically viable product.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, you're saying it's a new kind of capitalist trick where they lose money by subsidizing the product in order to make it completely unprofitable for all of the other companies?

I have it on good authority that this is an incorrect take.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 22 hours ago

Nope. They subsidize the product so that people are more willing to pay, and they're betting that they have deeper pockets than the competition (hence, a race to the bottom). Once they can no longer subsidize the product, the idea is that you're so addicted to it (or you've integrated it so much to your product) that you'll pay the full price.

Except that no one will, because they're already increasing prices and people and companies are waking up to the fact the cost does not outweigh the benefits.

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 10 points 1 day ago

OpenAI has a trillion dollars in financial obligations they need to meet by 2030. I doubt Clear Channel's financial obligations were in the same order of magnitude.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›