this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
96 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

85574 readers
4372 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 minutes ago

The path Tim Cook(and all his rich friends) are on is going to be unavoidable for them soon enough. Keep pushing AI my friend. The more you push the better the result Tim.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 9 hours ago

I see the new definition of "unavoidable" has just dropped.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

The AI-driven price increases:

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 63 points 1 day ago

Tech CEOs: Shove AI in everything they do

Ram Prices: Skyrocket to account for AI usage

Tech CEOs: Price raises are unavoidable!

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 day ago

Heaven forbid their margins be lowered. 46% is barely scraping by!

[–] group_hug@sh.itjust.works 16 points 23 hours ago

AI isn't driving up prices. Oligarchs are. And they aren't using their own money but our retirement funds to do it.

Ai is just a tool. One that is being built out because the billionaires demand it. They are already wielding this tool to bludgeon the masses.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe we were askng for it by dressing that way.

[–] mPony@kbin.earth 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess there's going to have to be a law, since the perpetrators just can't control themselves.

[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 3 points 1 day ago

Bah, maybe in some backwater European country like Germany or France, no laws in Freedomville™ America, Laws are for COMMIES who hate capitalism!

/s

[–] Q_the_misanthrope@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s everything with any memory or processing onboard.

I’m seeing it in my industry, devices are increasing in price every quarter to 6 months. These all cost businesses more money than even a year ago, and those costs will be passed to us.

It’s easy to call Apple out, but understand that any device in your house with any memory from robot vacuums to home surveillance cameras to routers are all affected by this drain of chips and components.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

We're also facing a shortage of the materials for PCBs.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-war-disrupts-the-circuit-board-supply-chain-raises-costs-tech-firms-2026-04-27/

Alongside the existing helium shortage, we're going to see higher prices for every part of a computer, even without the chatbot hype buying.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hmm...I don't own a car so I can avoid high gas prices. I think I can safely stay away from AI and save the big bucks. Forced adoption of AI sounds so "mark of the beast" to me.

[–] adhdsergio@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

The price increases will trickle to you in some form

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Demand for electricity will raise electricity prices, and demand for gas to run the electricity plants will raise heating costs.

Demand for RAM makes the price of even Rapsberry Pi go up. The AI bubble is the tail wagging the economy dog.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Maybe a little, but the rise in the costs of AI will make a huge number of people to stop using it since it’s not that life changing, bringing the prices down again.

[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Because the cost of memory is driving up device prices.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting how it's driving up hardware costs and driving down software costs

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do you think it's driving down software costs?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I can see it's driving down costs, I work in industry. Lots of competitors have popped up with AI apps with lower prices. There's a reason it's called the SaaS apocalypse

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Well as a person who is working as a software developer I wouldn't be so hasty.

You can write more code, but that has never been a real bottleneck. Understanding and maintenance of this code is another matter altogether.

Add to that the price of AI subscriptions are currently heavily subsidized by venture capital and even with the subsidies tokens turn out to be more expensive than people.

Also no one is calling it SaaS apocalypse.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone -1 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

https://www.economist.com/business/2026/06/10/fear-of-the-saaspocalypse-is-tormenting-techland

https://www.forbes.com/sites/donmuir/2026/02/04/300-billion-evaporated-the-saaspocalypse-has-begun/

https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/01/saas-in-saas-out-heres-whats-driving-the-saaspocalypse/

https://www.risingtrends.co/blog/saas-apocalypse-trend

It is very much being called the SaaS apocalypse...

Where are AI subscriptions subsidised for enterprise use? Github copilot was the last to drop the subsidised model for big business at the start of the month as far as I can tell. Only individuals and very small businesses are getting subsidised subscriptions now, and it's still super economical and cost efficient to use even frontier models at API billing rates compared to humans. A human can work all day on debugging a software defect, or Opus can find the root cause in ten minutes for $20. Sure that still needs reviewing but that's insane productivity AND cost improvement

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Only individuals and very small businesses are getting subsidised subscriptions now

How is not a single AI company profitable then?

it's still super economical and cost efficient to use even frontier models at API billing rates compared to humans.

No

A human can work all day on debugging a software defect, or Opus can find the root cause in ten minutes for $20

Yeah or it can delete your prod database without asking you. Additionally the heavy use of AI can lead to comprehension debt meaning no one can understand it. AI is good if it has the data but usually the data is not only code it's Kafka and infrastructure and other ongoing outages that may be related and logs.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 22 minutes ago

https://aitoolsrecap.com/Blog/anthropic-first-profit-2026-revenue-breakdown

An article about companies forgetting to set budgets? Wow that trumps the claim that correct application of AI is more productive and cost effective than human work

Why the fuck would you give it full unfettered access to your production system?

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

This is more of a parallel of the video game crash that happened before. When the video game consoles created a bubble in the US every body suddenly started creating video games, to the point many were so bad they were literally unplayable. When the market got flooded with bad games, people stopped buying games (since no one trusted the quality anymore), leading to a crash in the industry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game_crash_of_1983

[–] DireTech@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

For my projects, finding the cause of a bug is rarely a problem once it’s reported. It’s fixing it in a way that doesn’t negatively impact things upstream or downstream that’s a pain.

How’s AI supposed to help when we’ve got to negotiate with several other stakeholders on what changes we’re going to make?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 20 minutes ago

So because you talk to people sometimes, there's nothing AI can assist on? That doesn't really make any sense