this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
753 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

85698 readers
4263 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Valve’s Steam Machine finally has a price: a whopping $1,049 for the 512GB configuration or $1,349 for the 2TB version. And those are without bundled controllers, which drive up the cost more.

The prices are so high in part because Valve isn’t subsidizing the hardware, and the company has already indicated that the component crisis forced it to reconsider its initial pricing plans. In an interview with the YouTube channel Gamers Nexus, Valve engineers discussed the reality of sourcing RAM in 2026, with take-it-or-leave-it prices as memory and other components remain in short supply, from only a few vendors like Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix.

[...]

Valve, of course, isn’t the only company in a bind over memory shortages, as the crunch is forcing many hardware makers to make significant pricing changes. Even Apple CEO Tim Cook is warning of incoming price hikes for iPhones, Macs, and other devices. And the RAM crunch isn’t projected to get better anytime soon.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (3 children)

After reporting how much the Steam Machine costs, I could tell already. RAM manufacturers are in paradise right now!

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

There's going to be a bloodbath when the AI bubble finishes popping.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk -5 points 19 hours ago

So we thought we'd just kick it to the customers

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (8 children)

If RAM prices are so bad, couldn't Valve give an option to order a Steam Machine with no RAM? So that people could use RAM they already have or buy some locally for a lower price.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

They give away their OS for free. So add a motherboard, a CPU, a case and a graphics card to it and you can use your own RAM.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 35 points 2 days ago (5 children)

My question is: how far back in time do we have to go to get to where RAM and SSD prices were this high (for a given capacity) in the past? Like 2021?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The last time we saw a price spike like this was when the Chinese adhesives factory caught fire and burned to the ground, those adhesives were used in all kinds of chips.

2013 - but even then it wasn't this bad.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/sep/06/china-fire-memory-chip-prices

There were also supply chain problems during Covid.

2020-2023:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896322017293

[–] tal@lemmy.today 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well...but @MangoCats@feddit.it isn't asking about the spike, but about the absolute price.

PC Part Picker's memory trends page unfortunately only shows the past 18 months. But we can hit archive.org's Wayback Engine.

First of all, here's a current level for DDR5-5200 2x16GB:

So about $500 for DDR5-5200 2x16GB.

They only started tracking this category back in early 2022-ish. It looks like it was about $380 then. Adjusted for inflation, that's $435.14 in 2026 dollars. So it's probably never been that expensive.

However, that was also when DDR5 was pretty new, and it looks like it started out expensive.

If we look at DDR4, which might be more interesting, since we can go back further and avoid the initial spike:

Looking at DDR4-3200 2x8GB, it's come down a bit, but looks like it peaked at about $190.

Inflation-adjusted, that's $144 in 2019 dollars.

It looks like that was about April 2019 when DDR4 exceeded the peak from the last few weeks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Bought a 256GB ssd for like 320€ in around 2011 (maybe 2012) so there's that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The point of shitty old processors was to get them cheap. Now that RAM and storage are the biggest factors, they could have gone with newer processors and not be significantly more expensive but significantly more performant.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 51 points 2 days ago

Shitty, old processors? In which way?

Zen 4 is literally just a single generation behind current latest gen architecture. And you're way off on the pricing too - Zen5 APUs are essentially the AI 300/400 lineup, of which the higher end models still cost well over what Valve would find affordable. Meanwhile the GPU Valve chose to be integrated into the SM is 30-40% more performant than the 890M bundled with the Ryzen AI 370 (the only affordable kinda-high-end Zen5 APU).

So no, it's neither old nor shitty.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 56 points 2 days ago (15 children)

It's weird how supply chains work, and how design changes are at the very start of a very long process that makes changing the design now a very costly, risky thing.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The entire cooling system is designed around those processors. Changing them would delay the Steam Machine by multiple years. Also, those processors may be old (or more accurately, based on an older architecture), but they’re certainly not shitty.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›