this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
1000 points (96.6% liked)

People Twitter

10120 readers
1768 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 70 points 1 day ago (13 children)
[–] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 56 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I am no Hunter apologist by any means, but this doesn't look like an LLM wrote it to me.

Not saying Hunter himself wrote it either; just doesn't look like a machine.

[–] pageflight@piefed.social 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"The lesson under the lesson:" is a very LLM closing statement.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 58 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I mean the AIs copied it from somewhere

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And the multiple "It's not [x], it's [y]"
"sword | question mark"
"strategy | empty room"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

An LLM probably didn't write it but it reads so painfully like the LLM dialect I cringed the entire time even though I agreed.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] architect@thelemmy.club 19 points 1 day ago

AI writing.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

7 is the one a lot of people on the left will miss is targeted at them. Cynicism is the path to defeat, pragmatism is the path to actual change, and it almost always routes through the status quo, not around it. Mamdani didn't sit around bitching about the DNC, nor did he try to run as a third party. He met voters where where they are, and in NYC that's the Democratic party. Now he looks like a king maker. This took him barely a year, during which time showed that the establishment's power to enforce preferences is actually far more limited than many believe.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The Democratic Party leadership is corrupt and those individuals are more interested in maintaining their own proximity to wealth and power than “winning” or providing any material benefit or protection for their supposed constituents. They don’t lose because they’re incompetent or tone deaf, they lose because they want to.

*or rather, they lose because it’s preferable to the left gaining power and taxing the rich, ending the private co-opting of the commons, and expanding the welfare state.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Biden 28: Let him take a crack at it.

Biden 28: Not perfect, but also, he doesn't rape kids.

Biden 28: Because the entire country needs an intervention.

... see, you just lean in to the idea that we live in clown world.

Then, you have a clown fight.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“Don’t fear the base, court it…”

Take a lesson from the Republicans.

Edit: current Democrat “base” is their corporate donors. So I have to qualify my statement with the idea that a social liberal/progressive will be courting the citizens, not Citizens United.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

!aidetector

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This man is CORRUPT and holds NO Valuable Opinion to the Democratic Party!

-The Democratic Party that ELECTED His Father!

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago

He has a tremendous hog, though. It's a matter of public record.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 7 points 1 day ago

Hunter is gonna run. Maybe not in 28, but he will run

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›