But they want to make money off the days from the network. Think about the shareholders value!!
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
190 points (96.6% liked)
Technology
85736 readers
4081 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
So the thesis of this piece is the government picking winners and losers in the auto industry through opaque mechanisms should terrify you because you should believe in total free market capitalism.
There's plenty I don't agree with regarding this administration's trade or industrial policy. This reasoning though, ain't it. It ain't even new with this administration. I'm not getting the vapors over corrupt auto industry protectionism. And I'm certainly not concerned about whatever lib shit this guy is wound up about.
It's because it's not transparent and seems arbitrary, this isn't mentioned but these are the perfect conditions for corruption or simple stupidity.
not transparent and seems arbitrary
Opaque regulatory inertia favoring established players could be the story of the American auto industry for the last century.
Yes, there has absolutely been some crazy situations in the past.
load more comments
(2 replies)
So the thesis of this piece is the government picking winners and losers in the auto industry through opaque mechanisms should terrify you because you should believe in total free market capitalism.
Those are not the only choices. For example, a rules-based and facts-based system of regulation is another possibility. But the current system's rule appears to be that the spoils go to whoever got a slice of Trump's goldfish-like attention, or wrote him a fat enough check.
And you might well get the vapors the next time one of the US automakers receives a massive government bailout because their having been protected from competition left them unable to compete in the global market, or possibly even in the time before that when US consumers are being forced to buy sub-mediocre products in order to fatten the bonuses of non-performing parasitic executives.
And it's good to remember that free markets are a myth, and that real capitalists love anything that shelters them from having to compete, even if it's protectionism.
load more comments
(1 replies)