this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
33 points (86.7% liked)

Technology

85736 readers
5520 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
33
Anthropic says Alibaba must be punished for largest Claude cloning attack (arstechnica.com)
submitted 3 hours ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 27 points 1 hour ago

image

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 4 points 56 minutes ago

Lol corporate thieves bitching about other corporate thieves is the funniest part of 2026

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 29 minutes ago

Ai cloned the world. Please give me a break.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 hour ago

Okay, so Anthropic distills MY copywriter data and it’s fine.

Alibaba distills Anthropic non-copywritable and that demands retaliation at the nation state level.

Fuck off. The rules are abundantly clear.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago

I heard there was some new AI model that was so amazing for cyber security that they had to limit access to it. It's just too bad Anthropic couldn't use that.

[–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 31 points 2 hours ago

Nooooo, you can't train on OUR data! That's illegal!!!1

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They stole to monetize without paying in money or attribution what we stole to monetize without paying money or attribution!

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Well, they did pay, just after the fact.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 24 minutes ago

Well they didn't pay me. But still used all my open source mit licensed code to train their model. And now I need to rent their compute back.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Is there a scenario in which they both lose? I'll take that.

[–] Franconian_Nomad@feddit.org 14 points 2 hours ago

Alibabas Qwen were among the first open weights models that were actually useful and can be run on consumer hardware without too much difficulties.

If they continue with that, they will hurt the business model of the big AI companies significantly, accelerating the burst of the bubble.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

AI going after their few paying costumers