this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
149 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

85791 readers
3860 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 29 points 5 hours ago

Nice! AI is the new ponzi scheme, but 'stakeholders', including the governments are in too deep to stop it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Lasher—who no AI company spent big money to elect—had just beaten Alex Bores, a state assemblyman who became the unlikely center of an extraordinary bidding war between rival AI factions. Pro-safety AI super PACs, including Public First Action backed by Anthropic, poured $19 million into supporting Bores. Leading the Future, tied to OpenAI president Greg Brockman and Andreessen Horowitz, spent $8 million trying to destroy him. Lasher won with 39% of the vote (while Kennedy scion Jack Schlossberg came in a distant third place). And then Lasher pledged to pursue the same AI regulation agenda as the man he beat.

Regardless of letter by the name, absolutely no amount of money can buy as many votes as anyone would get by not taking AI money...

No one actually wants this shit except the politicians who have been bribed to make it happen no matter what.

Pushing this hard on one of the only issues that actually has widescale support is going to really backfire. Even people who see AI is inevitable, none of them want datacenters anywhere near them.

What's fucking crazy, is no one is trying to build out in Alaska.

Cold as fuck, sparsely populated, huge tax breaks for everyone, and I gotta assume there's major internet connections they could tap into when it crosses continents at the shortest point.

Or like Japan building underseas by thermal vents, but in America they build them in fucking neighborhoods, likely knowing it will crash all surrounding property values giving them easy expansion down the road.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

There are exactly zero undersea cables from Alaska to Asia. I think the reasons should be obvious. There is one to Alaska from the lower 48.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Not yet

And while this article has an estimated completion date of this year, current projections have it pushed out to 2029

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago
[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

It seems kind of apparent to me that despite their wealth, these people just aren't that bright. They throw money around like it's nothing... There has to be a way we can grift them. Maybe create local level voting 'blocks' where you get thousands of people to basically sign on to a charter where they will vote in line with the group, and they just need to pay like 5 million to the block, which then gets divided to everyone in the block.

But here's the fun part... People can just do whatever the fuck they want to do, and even vote against that candidate. There would be no legal recourse. Just get the money up front paid to the llc front you make for the block. Distribute, then do your thing. As they get more desperate they may try shit like that.