this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
45 points (92.5% liked)

Fuck AI

7069 readers
422 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Noticed some AI evangelists try with the same kind of fake centrism, that was pretty popular during the Gamergate era. In this case, they try to set up people spamming genAI slop against "fanatical anti-AI people". But just as many loves to pretend moderates are "far-left", as their past-Gamergate selves pretended Anita Sarkeesian demanded state censorship of sexist videogames, as they are now pretending Hasan Piker is the most radical leftist living today (there are much worse even within the content creator sphere, such as Badempanda) to illustrate the "horseshoe theory", the table is tilted in favor of AI adoption.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Anyone claiming to be an "enlightened centrist" are either a bot or right winger who doesn't want to be associated so openly with it.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Keep seeing "Local AI has zero of the ethical concerns of corporate AI" from self-described Leftists too

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

PewDiePie tried that, his PC dedicated for the AI learning almost burned his flat down.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 hours ago

He's always rubbed me the wrong way, there's a disengenuine vibe about him

So it was almost a happy story

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I never understood that. Are they suddenly not using stolen works? I grant them that it has fewer of the ecological concerns, but it still has all of the ethical concerns (potentially more, considering deepfakes aren't being restricted).

[–] TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Anarchists dont recognize copyright as a moral or ethical framework.

[–] Comrade_Spood@quokk.au 3 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

No, but we do recognize scabbing, plus lets not forget the effects AI has had on people's mental health. I would also argue there is a moral and ethical issue with taking other people's work without crediting that goes beyond just copyright. Particularly so when trying to profit off of it.

Lastly, to build off of my scabbing point. If we look at prior historical cases that are comparable, like the automation that sparked the Luddite movement, I think that its easy to see how anti-AI is pro-worker. AI (like industrialization) costs workers jobs, and while we live in a society that requires you to work to live, that is bad. It is not to say industrialization (or AI in this case) is inherently bad. Just simply that until society no longer works this way, it is harmful to workers. And in case it needs clarification, artists are workers.