Dems discovering ~10 years too late that "they go low, we go high" is a failed strategy.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I'm not saying democrats shouldn't do this, but redistricting into a situation that causes permanent red and blue states feels a bit 'civil warry' to me.
And given that the democrats as a whole are at least centre right, having permanent blue states might prevent an authoritarian takeover now, but won't solve the long term problems anyway.
Y'all really need to get your head around the fact that you've been in a civil war for 6 months.
Denial isn't a river in Egypt, your window for preventing ethnic cleansing and political pogroms is rapidly closing
We're already in a cold civil war. Best we start acknowledging that and prepare accordingly.
It will have to be a very temporary thing until the democrats have a big enough majority to permanently completely restructure the way elections are done.
And why the fuck would those greedy, corrupt bastards do that when they have the majority to do anything they want? Why would they let their competition compete?
Sure, this is better than republicans being in permanent control, but it's still the end of democracy in USA, and the ones in power have 0 incentive to bring back democracy as long as the american public aren't willing to shoot their oppressors to defend or bring back democracy.
I hate it that it's come to this level of lunacy
Come back to this level of lunacy.
The US has been here before.
Actually, a few times:
- Prior to the seven years war, the governor of Virginia was so openly corrupt the other colonies refused to official business with the colony, as he would just assign the contracts to his firms and run away with any money.
After the seven years war, leading up to the US revolution, things were very heated. Mostly from: 2a. Rich colonials defrauding British banks via loan fraud. 2b. Rich people then using said funds to buy up the available land, driving prices out of reqch of the regular colonials. 2c. Rich colonials got really pissy that the stamp act was going to prevent them from executing loan fraud. 2d. Rich colonialists astroturfing imaginary support for motiona and even faking riots to make it look like they had popular support. (Note that this was so faked that English speaking Canada became a thing out of this.) 3. The only land they would give to the poor people was in the strictly off limits Ohio Valley as that land was seen as native land in tha ks for them winning the war in North America for England. Neither the natives or the crown soldiers stood for this, but it was paid for by the rich colonials en mass, so was functionally unstoppable.
About 50 to 100 years later: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mason%E2%80%93Dixon_line the Mason-Dixie line became a thing and the two sides fought to gerrymander support for slavery/freedom. Which ended causing the US civil war.
I mean... It definitely has not but ok
Actually, a few times:
- Prior to the seven years war, the governor of Virginia was so openly corrupt the other colonies refused to official business with the colony, as he would just assign the contracts to his firms and run away with any money.
After the seven years war, leading up to the US revolution, things were very heated. Mostly from: 2a. Rich colonials defrauding British banks via loan fraud. 2b. Rich people then using said funds to buy up the available land, driving prices out of reqch of the regular colonials. 2c. Rich colonials got really pissy that the stamp act was going to prevent them from executing loan fraud. 2d. Rich colonialists astroturfing imaginary support for motiona and even faking riots to make it look like they had popular support. (Note that this was so faked that English speaking Canada became a thing out of this.) 3. The only land they would give to the poor people was in the strictly off limits Ohio Valley as that land was seen as native land in tha ks for them winning the war in North America for England. Neither the natives or the crown soldiers stood for this, but it was paid for by the rich colonials en mass, so was functionally unstoppable.
About 50 to 100 years later: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mason%E2%80%93Dixon_line the Mason-Dixie line became a thing and the two sides fought to gerrymander support for slavery/freedom. Which ended causing the US civil war.
History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes.
Men rarely change in any meaningful way, through the patterns of human actions we recreate scenarios over and over again.
Im glad their fighting but it's no surprise what they finally chose to fight for is to further entrench their own power. If they continue to simply pass all the fascist apointments and vote for cloture so no one in their own party can even filibuster it's not gonna matter how many dems there are and republicans will once again get their way from the minority as they have done before.
When they go low, make them suck your dick.
Yes please.
Dems need to grow spines and stop being pussies. Fight fire with fire.
Cripes…No Democrats, it’s not fighting Texas, it’s fighting against every damn red state.
Speak to shit realistically for the love of democracy.
From Missouri: THANK YOU!
They need to get their timing right so that the red states can't sneak in even more redistricting.
Yeah they have already talked a few other states. I still prefered the deadmans swtich option though where its all passed and setup so that the new map becomes the map the moment any other state changes their map.