this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
356 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

86145 readers
3899 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Author: Michael Lydick. I'm guessing his middle name is Claude.

What, no way, who ever could have seen that coming?

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

This is so stupid.

My understanding is that you can’t make a gun from 100% 3D printed plastic parts. Why don’t you just regulate those final parts makers?

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

While 100% is currently impractical, you can actually print 95% of a gun for 22lr. You need a nail for a fireing pin a barrel insert, and spings you can get from a nerf gun. That said, you could use the same to convert a nerf gun.

I'm also not talking about the single shot proto gun you've seen, I'm talking about a scaled model of a 1911. Guns are so fucking simple and regulation is like trying to prevent lock picking.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Steve@startrek.website 3 points 3 days ago

Its a silly strawman.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

For the same reason that it would be better to regulate polluters than to expect individuals to recycle their waste en masse. Regulating this at an individual level is demonstrably less effective, given that the recovery of self-created guns used in crimes has increased significantly in recent years.

Whether anti-gun 3D-printing algorithms will even work isn't certain yet, but I'm all for giving it a try and forcing people to risk acquiring said weapons via legit manufacturers and shops which may be more traceable or risk the black market.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are they cracking down on 85% receivers? I mean those pose a much bigger risk

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

85% is a firearm, 80% is a fancy paperweight. No DVs from me just want to keep everyone straight on the law

/source: me I make 80% guns from time to time, next is a Glock 19

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›