this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
817 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

86145 readers
4051 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And that was supposed to be the backbone of the space based data center

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arc99@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Satellite internet is a last resort. People shouldn't be using it if they have fibre broadband or 5G options that provide the same speeds. It's a lifesaver if you're on a boat, or live off grid, or just a few miles from where the broadband ends. But if it's anywhere with other people then it's going to max out with horrible contention. At the point the only option is "moar satellites".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Who wrote this article?

"A SpaceX support page (which appears to only be available in Swahili, for some erason)"

Don't get me wrong. Fuck any satellite service, and especially FUCK fElon. This article is trash, though.

[–] Marija@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago

I mean, high demand shouldn't justify surprise pricing

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Guy is being a little too trigger happy with this bait and switch but it should still surprise absolutely no one. Starlink with it‘s thousands of satellites, requiring hundreds of rocket launches is ridiculously expensive to operate and can‘t hope to compete with fiber price wise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 3 days ago (3 children)

If a V1 satellite only has 24 Gbit/s in total capacity on its links to the base station, and a V2 mini satellite only 96 Gbit/s, then it's no wonder really.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] negativenull@piefed.world 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I saw my first billboard advertising Starlink in Billings, MT today. They have avoided advertising in the past.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Generally they haven't needed to. For most of the situations where Starlink really shines like rural connections, the alternatives are objectively a lot worse. And the other common situation is to avoid a regional monopoly which is still like 90% of the US.

Starlink basically sells itself, even with Elon at the helm.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Starlink will enshittify like all other non-PUD ISPs. This article shows that, and it's already begun to struggle with throughput and scaling it is becoming more and more of a challenge.

There is one alternative that has been shown to be better than anything else: PUD projects which treat internet access as a utility and not something to make more and more money off of. The FCC has rural grants for ISPs that serve rural areas, but instead of exclusively funding PUD projects, they keep giving money to big for-profit ISPs (like Starlink).

Starlink should be considered a band-aid and only something that you'd need when you were in a super rural area without other utilities. The solution is giving everyone with grid connections public fiber via PUDs.

I know we don't live in a utopia where that will happen overnight, and we don't have an FCC that gives a shit. But the FCC should not be giving a trillionaire taxpayer dollars for a half-baked, polluting, wasteful service that will ultimately do the same rugpull that other private ISPs have done.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

I am guessing this is to amp up the stock price of the GrokSpaceLink IPO.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 10 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Fine by me. All his customers are a bunch of suckers

[–] withabeard@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

I am an IT bod with a mountain rescue team in the UK. Personally I would bin starlink in a heartbeat. I dislike Elon, I dislike the privatisation of satellite garbage. The impact it had on the night sky, on astronomy. I dislike the pettish for abuse from a fascist American oligarchy and government.

However... For now it is by far the single best option when cell communications are out of range.

[–] clucose@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago

Ukraine is a user, as is (with stolen terminals) Russia.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›