this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
574 points (99.7% liked)

Fuck AI

7560 readers
754 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pointless rant. Please ignore. I'm a software developer and we all know how AI has changed our industry. How we work or why we're fired and why we can't afford PCs.

Anyways, we're already all forced to use AI already and we're already atrophying the minds of our juniors. It's great.

New team meeting and one of our managers tells us that we're never going to write code anymore at all. The AI will read the JIRA ticket and create the pull request (change request to the codebase) on GitHub. Our job is to only review the code on GitHub and then rank how well AI did and then comment and then get AI to fix it. We have to do this so we can improve the AI process. Which is funny because none of the people who plan this AI shit are data scientists. The only way they can change things is by promoting, it's not like we're releasing our own coding models but anyways ... He's like, now you should be able to do much more work and just review PRs all day now and that we should never be doing only one thing. You can only tell AI through a GitHub comment to fix a mistake and then you can start reviewing the next thing.

We were like, if it's a simple fix why can't we just fix it?

"Because we need to improve the AI process"

But then, I have to context switch.

"Yes that's the point you can come back to it later"

Why come back to it later when we can solve it now? We can even use AI to solve it now.

"No, we want you just comment on the PR so the bot can handle it"

Context switching is free apparently... It's actually infuriating because apparently we're not using IDEs any more. I personally use the GitHub plugin to review PRs in my IDE but no one else seems to do it so I don't think they even took that into account.

These guys have auto merged AI code that's taken us weeks to unravel and which we still haven't fully been able to fix. They just merge shit all the time and a lot of it is fucking slip. AI merged hundreds of tests and no one cares when they break. They didn't configure prettier because AI doesn't use it so it breaks out formatting when humans do it.

I ranted to my own manager for 30 minutes about it today and he was just as upset because every developer is now asking what exactly are they doing. My manager asked me what I would do. I said the process sucks but what are we supposed to do as devs. If I review 20 PRs a day, how is the company going to ensure my skills are gonna be sharp? What are we doing about taking in ideas from regular devs? How do we ensure code ownership when we're just merging tickets we don't write and code we had no hand in shaping?

Sorry. I actually thought I had faith in my company with AI because they were coming up with thoughtful approaches but it seems like utter incompetence.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds like a scenario for which malicious compliance was invented.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So... just regular compliance in this case?

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We have to do this so we can improve the AI process.

I'm curious what they mean by this. Are they just clueless about how anything works? Maybe AI companies are signing contracts with companies to upload all their code, data, traces, etc; so that the AI companies can improve their models? I.e. companies are acting like reinforcement tuning contractor firms for AI companies?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Unionize and collectively bargain. You owners are trying to get you to teach your replacement. Right now you are 1 squeaky gear in the great machine of your corporation. The c-suite isn't bothered by it. But if every gear and cog on the dev team worked together you could end it.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago

Lol why are you training it? You're a software dev with a product, not ai qa. Wild times we're in. Should really just cut your losses and gut all ai and go back to where you were before it. If you can't do that, then your company no longer has a purpose.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 11 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Where do you people work where you cant just tell the manager how stupid that is? They're part of your team and their role requires them lean on the expertise of their team. So provide your expertise and make the case why that shouldnt happen. It should be relatively easy given they arent training the model so it wont actually learn anything from your comments it will just waste money/time.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In sociology, we call it McDonaldization. By reducing a job to a series of fixed, repeatable steps, they can pay less.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Look your manager in the eye and tell them they everything you think about AI. directly. Don't beat around the bush. Even better if you bring 1-3 other devs with you.

Schedule the meeting yourself if you have to. Tell them the damage to their product. Scare the ever loving shit out of them.

They jump on the bandwagon because they are afraid. Only way to pull them back is with more fear

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Form a small company with colleagues. Call it UnSlopify.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

My way of doing this is to work it by hand then have AI commit it and cut a PR.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ah, nothing like training your replacement. I don’t know why I try to get into IT; it’s trashed by AI/vibe coding.

I guess, right now, I’ll just maintain my private cloud, but with rsync getting vibe coding, it’s only a matter of time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It seems like the trend is don't even watch the code, many vs code forks for vibe coding now don't even have the coding portion, it's a giant prompt in some electron app

For example Google antigravity

Google antigravity

Or windsurf that openai almost paid 3 billion before changing idea (now renamed to something else) also became just a prompt

It's going to backfire spectacularly, approving pr by just reading them in the browser is insane

One thing is "I'm lazy to do this specific thing, I ask the tool to do the specific task by inserting only the useful files in context, then review manually before committing"

Another is "I write a generic prompt "add a photo sharing feature" then it directly opens a PR where another bot reads it and generates a review with so many emojis that it must good 👍🏻😊 boom merge it all the tests pass ✅ ✔️ ✅ ✔️" and then nobody actually knows what it did

Of course the ai companies prefer the second approach before without a subscription the first uses 1 cent in tokens, the second uses $100 in tokens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

The github comment thing is insane lmao.

I know its the classic dumb suggestion, but best to clean up your resume just in case.

Should make a complaint that github commenting is too slow and that devs need direct access via an API/dev key so that they can use AI to speed up the PR review process significantly.

Then watch the ensuing flames as they make a pipeline that automatically reviews every PR using the same LLM lol.

/s?

[–] ViscloReader@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I just saw a skit on youtube about a company stealing keyboards so the employees have to talk to AI chatbot to code. Hold on, lemme find it... Found it: https://youtu.be/eBRzdfU-K30

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Even with examples and docs, I spent hours 3 days ago to try to sort an issue on our side using AI.

Gave up, solved it myself better than our examples in 5 mins

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›