this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
468 points (90.6% liked)

Technology

86387 readers
3934 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Lmk when they're corebooted.

Otherwise I'll stick with system76 or starlabs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Honestly, why would I spend thousands on a framework, when I can spend 3x less or more, with a used thinkpad, that is already fairly repairable?

If I was rich, sure, I'd buy a framework in a heartbeat, but am not rich, yet . . . . . . .

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

let me guess: the devices live 2x as long but cost 3x as much?

[–] vairse@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Actually, excluding current craziness around ram/drives their prices were pretty comparable, at least to Dell when I checked last year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This proves that making a product twice as expensive actually does decrease sales significantly if you aren't Apple.

[–] kshade@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It isn't twice as expensive though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

This may seem weird but I dislike the aspect ratio of their screens.

I have a desktop with 16:9 monitors and a laptop with 16:10.

Those are close enough that your workflow doesn't really change. But 2:3 is different enough it makes a difference.

That and for what they are they're crazy expensive. So I went for a Slimbook (kinda the Spanish version of Tuxedo). They're not perfect but I found them "good enough".

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Framework's whole thing is upgradable laptops. The increased cost is what you pay for the upgradable platform instead of buying a new laptop.

Repairability has already been proven multiple times by several OEMs like Lenovo.

Even if the repair process itself becomes tedious, the mark of a quality OEM is offering parts and schematics that allow repair shops to disgnose and fix broken machines.

Unlike Apple, which actively prohibits their vendors from selling any parts to anyone except Apple.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I got a Framework 13 that originally came with an 11th Gen Intel mainboard in it for free. It suffered a mainboard failure.

Swapped the mainboard with a Ryzen board, installed some used DDR5 from eBay and reused all of the other components. Now I have a Framework 13 for around $500 and it's likely the last laptop I'll ever need to own, if I can keep upgrading it every few years.

[–] dasrael@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

s/willing/can afford/

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The idea of repairable notebooks sound good, except it's done by getting filtered through the tech bro lens. Still an ultrabook, the ports must be interchangeable modules to amaze the investors/users.

[–] corbindallas@fedinsfw.app 5 points 1 week ago

I'M nobody!!!!

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

I bought a 13" years ago. I thought I would have upgraded the cpu/motherboard, battery, speakers, screen by now but I could never justify the cost for the benefit. So it is the same as the day I bought it. I have bought cheap laptops for kids schooling and had to replace one for what would have been a repairable fault on a Framework but there is a massive price difference and could not justify another Framework. It is a shame. Their stuff needs to be a lot cheaper but it is a chicken and egg with volume.

When they made a cheap "chromebook" class plastic school laptop for kids it ended up costing more than a vastly more powerful mac (even before Apple released their cheap models). The low volume manufacturing had heaps of problems reported on their forums. Its strictly for the fans sadly. People with lots of disposable income who buy one in every colour. I would have loved to buy a similar looking product at a mainstream price and with modern specs but it makes no sense with current cost of living pressures.

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 4 points 1 week ago

To me it is that i upgrade to few times so the laptop would be 10 years old and then everything is out of date. Maybe upgrade battery in between. However, I guess these are really good in the used(resold) market.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›