this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
413 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

86387 readers
3734 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] amoogus@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago
[–] darthsundhaft@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

GL already turned when he sold over to Disney. He himself was very limiting towards the progression of Star Wars even before that. I'll admit there are very convincing AI attempts online that IMO actually outdo what Disney has come out with since they've won rights, but that alone doesn't justify using AI.

What this all boils down to is that Disney should not hold the rights. At the end of the day, these AI users are still putting down some kind of story and better dialogue which Disney does not want to follow. They've forgone the real essence and telling of Star Wars and have replaced it with a very Disney vibe that appeals to what Disney chooses to. They've left out the fans entirely.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

lol Nope. I'll happily watch the worst films made by the worst human hack writers over the even the best regurgitated slop "films" that a chatbot pisses out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Anyone who saw the Special Editions and expected anything else deserves to be unpleasantly surprised right now

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Lucas has never seen a technology he wasn't willing to shoehorn and abuse in one of his films.

He's like the polar opposite of James Cameron.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

your mistake by selling SW rights to disney who ended using a slop generator, shouldve done a partial ownership instead. instead of getting rare sw films or shows that are decent, its just slop now.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I'm sure this thread will be full of rational discussion.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure he'll make gobs of money off of it, as contradictory as the fan base is they will fill the theaters

[–] Havoc8154@mander.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

Which he would get exactly $0 from since he has no ownership of Star Wars anymore.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is what passes for journalism these days? Fuck off

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Old, white and wealthy. Of course he thinks AI is the future, all his kind do.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›