this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2026
66 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12169 readers
335 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Another internet law for people's "protection" that just happens to be implemented in the most surveillance-friendly way. There are ways to prove age that don't let anyone know your identity, but governments never choose them. Combine this with Bill C-22 and its a huge assault on internet privacy for Canadians.

Right? Like many years ago, maybe we didnt have effective technology to do it in a privacy focused way, but we do now. Any decision not to use these ways is a blatant power grab and intentional invasion of privacy.

[–] bitwise@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is, of course, their insane attempt to regulate access to information that will ultimately be the stepping stone they use to justify banning VPNs, computers without government controls, and so on.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

to justify banning VPNs

Never going to happen. Businesses would be up in arms about this.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As far as I'm aware, anyone can set up a VPN through aws, which can then tunnel to whatever vpn, so they can't even really ban them, just disincentivize companies from openly operating. The UK seems to have given up on that particular avenue.

Anyone have a good guide on how to set one up like that, you know, for science

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They absolutely can ban them by making VPN use to circumvent age restriction a criminal offence. That'll drop VPN use in the vast majority of cases, regardless of who provides the service - a corporation or DIY. They probably won't go that far, but who knows. Point is they can.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 11 points 5 days ago

The imbalance becomes even more pronounced when weighing the law’s benefits against its harms. The harms are certain, immediate, and irreversible, as the verification infrastructure exposes millions of identity documents to providers largely beyond the reach of Canadian privacy law, a risk demonstrated by the Discord breach that leaked roughly 70,000 government-issued IDs last fall. Privacy alone may not decide the case, but the verification mandate is not only a privacy cost. A law that conditions access to social media for online expression by requiring proof of identity limits expression itself for Canadians of all ages. The benefits, by contrast, are speculative at best, given mounting data from Australia that suggests a ban is ineffective.

Protecting youth, made a law that protect no one, refuse to elaborate