this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
480 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

86548 readers
3426 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

What an epic pump-n-dump.

I figured that would happen

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Still paychotic its even at $120.

[–] Redditisbollocks@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

There's a fucking surprise.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

To nobody's surprise

[–] stermy4u@lemmy.world 168 points 3 days ago (3 children)

First round of insider shareholders haven’t legally been allowed to even liquidate yet. This will be a bloodbath.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

don't give me hope

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (3 children)

do we know when that's gonna happen? i heard they used some loopholes to allow insider holders to sell early.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's more a question what'll happen to the other AI companies. Investors have now seen the first of the big ones tank. They'll wonder if the same will happen with OpenAI, Antrophic and other AI adjacent like Microsoft, Nvidia. For a bunch of companies living of venture capital, that's deadly.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I thought SpaceX made space rockets?

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For the IPO I think only 7% of the value of the company was for their space related activities (what they are actually doing). 93% of the value was for the non existent AI activities.

SpaceX is now a public company valued for its AI potential, so what comes next?

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 46 points 3 days ago (4 children)

After the merger with xAI, that's about 22% of their business. The rest is AI. The brochure will tell you about reaching for the stars and living on Mars, but the main product is actually Grok.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Which just goes to show you how bullshit the profit margins are on space travel when they gotta turn the business into a chat bot to be "profitable"

[–] locahosr443@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It had nothing to do with profit and everything to do with the tens of billions in debt that was coming due. The merger then ipo was just to dump that bill on the public.

It's even questionable to me if some of the space x investors will be able to get out above water... Some of those shares were sold at insanely high values then diluted. Fuck them all of course, but seems likely all this ipo achieves is another year or so of runway for the ponzi

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I disagree. That part is actually a somewhat reasonable business (though partially held up by public funds through contracts). The issue isn't what part is profitable. The issue is what part is getting all the investment and speculation. SpaceX was probably still overvalued for a space company, but they were doing something with measurable tangible value. The AI side is pure promise, and it's only speculation, and the speculation is wild. It's valued higher than something that's actually making profit.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I get what you're getting at, but I'd argue that we should look holistically at spacex. If their business model is launching a bazillion satellites and making a bazillion dollars we have to look at the entire launch complex as operating capital of starlink and spaceai. It all depends on starship launching a bazillion times a day so we should include development costs of starship as costs of starlink. The need for these businesses are necessary because the boom in private bookings of rocket launches that was anticipated with cheap launch services hasn't materialized and so they have an airport and planes without passengers.

I ain't no rocket economist but it seems "all the money" that starlink makes arent enough.

[–] CybranM@feddit.nu 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean the only part of SpaceX making money is the space part, starlink

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

A part of the space part !

I read that if space x worked perfectly today, they have to do some 470 launches to just equalize Ariane because of the enormous cost spacex have had.

Hopefully we (the EU) will make reusable rockets for less...

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

That's the part making revenue, we're unsure if it's making a profit.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MyFriendGodzilla@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Gonna go grab my rubber ducky.

[–] lietuva@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Exit liquidity, bunch of IPOs this year gonna fall the same pattern.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] kamee@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Meme stocks are meme stocks

[–] OS2Warp@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

💎 🙌🏻 🚀 🌕

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 68 points 3 days ago

It can go lower!

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 84 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Musk announced on social media that “Grok for Excel is live,” referencing the platform’s conversational AI tool.

Hahahahaha wtf is this shit?

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No, you don't get it, Musk has a plan.

  • Step 1: It fails utterly and completely.
  • Step 2: Musk goes on Twitter/X, and says, "Had to add more math to training data."
  • Step 3: CSAM and MechaHitler for some reason.
  • Step 4: Musk demands to speak to Grok's manager.

After that, it's basically a straight line to success.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Tankin the economy with one easy trick!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago

not low enough

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 27 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Its barely got history on the stock market so its hardly a 'record low'. Just say the price has dipped and leave it at that.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If it’s the lowest it’s been to date, it’s literally a record low. Calling it that is accurate and usefully descriptive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TBi@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

But how will we know if it’s SLAMMED or DESTROYED if they don’t say it?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Yeah, but that doesn't make for good clickbait.

And most people who will click on this article don't have a fundamental understanding of the stock market, investing, or why this isn't really that big of a deal.

(Still, however, don't invest in SpaceX. The stock is structured so retail investors don't have meaningful voting rights.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Buttlicker, our price have never been lower!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Ha, eat shit Elon.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

Not tech, but good news nevertheless :D

load more comments
view more: next ›