Selfhosted

61335 readers

298 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

[AIT] The Codeberg ban on LLM content (aussie.zone)

submitted 2 weeks ago by SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

143 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Right - I see the other topic has been locked / author hasn't returned to follow community rules.

Here's the original topic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49003386

and a measured (IMHO) response to it. (BTW, do your self a favour and change tabs with that site open :)

https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/i-regret-migrating-to-codeberg/

It's a tough spot, Codeberg has found themselves in and I wish them luck. But beyond that, this is (yet) another reminder that in 2026, if you don't self host it, the cloud is just someone else computer

(page 3) 45 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

OOTL Wasn't there something about forgejos capabilities to federate? I had the impression, that it would go the fediverse route with many interacting instances. Then everyone can make their own rules. There are many reason to moderate repos. So why is this such a big thing (if forgejo federates as I remembered from the back of my head)?

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Because Codeberg is its own charity type thing they have a cohort of users that vote on decisions made and you cannot even see how they came to that decision because that area is restricted to them. Presumably they might not federate at all.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] JTode@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Response guy seems to think that "legitimate crypto" is a thing.

My SSH keys are legitimate crypto. Fake money for criminals is not legitimate.

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters	More Letters
DNS	Domain Name Service/System
Git	Popular version control system, primarily for code
SSH	Secure Shell for remote terminal access

3 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 7 acronyms.

[Thread #63 for this comm, first seen 26th Jul 2026, 08:50] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I stopped putting anything on codeberg and finished moving to sourcehut after they announced this. I'm stuck with Github due to work but policing whatever random repos I have and want source control is a bit of a dick move.

I have a local forjejo which replicates certain repos to Codeberg and others to Github. Now I have to adjust my integration.

load more comments