this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
85 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

86600 readers
2986 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] obvs@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago

Do it with prejudice!

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Is there a legal difference? Like if they are quashed does that constrain the government in some way?

[–] Ava@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 19 minutes ago

I'm not a lawyer, but my guess is that this is more about publicly admonishing the DOJ lawyers to encourage them not to file them in the first place. There's a difference between telling someone "No" and telling someone "Are you fucking kidding me with this stupid shit?"

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago)

Only legally

Edit: also, ya, how would it not?? They rely on perverting the already perverted money-dependant legal system

[–] db2@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Don't give them the option.