this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
206 points (94.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7560 readers
1526 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The argument the mod writes is πŸ‘Œ

Update : there’s a new one that appears but, I’ve checked, that’s the same mod as the others

Update 2 : got contacted by the mod, overall sweet guy/gal we agree to disagree and keep the ban up, who said that Lemmy cannot be civil

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whoiswrongwithyou@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 hours ago

You don’t need to redact your rap sheet, it’s public.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

LCARS was a data access and retrieval system capable of doing calculations and simulations. It was not, I REPEAT, was not "artificial intelligence". It did not try to act or sound sentient, it simply responded to commands and ran programs.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 2 points 35 minutes ago

There is at least one instance where it was written as sapient in TNG. That was mostly for a joke, though. Specifically, there was a running gag in early TNG with Data getting a bit too into defining things and someone (usually Picard) would interrupt him with something along the lines of, "Thank you, Data, we get it." In one scene, Data is alone and only talking to the computer, which gives the line there.

Update 2 makes me smile.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 hours ago

Obviously I’m not enough of an AI hater cause I ain’t been banned from shit.

[–] Exatron@lemmy.world 19 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

These people understand Star Trek is fictional, often takes place on quasi-military vessels, and depicts a society that has some significant differences from our own, right?

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 58 minutes ago

But let's for a moment ignore that it is fictional. Star Trek's economical system is communism, I wonder if they also embrace it?

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Exatron@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

A friend has compared generative AI to the electric monks from Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective agency.

I've found that the AI chatbots feel a lot like the Genunine People Peronalities from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You’ll have to spark my memories because I don’t remember those

[–] Exatron@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

From Dirk Gently

The Electric Monk was a labour-saving device, like a dishwasher or a video recorder. Dishwashers washed tedious dishes for you, thus saving you the bother of washing them yourself, video recorders watched tedious television for you, thus saving you the bother of looking at it yourself; Electric Monks believed things for you, thus saving you what was becoming an increasingly onerous task, that of believing all the things the world expected you to believe.

In the book, an alien ship crashed on earth, the crew asked an electric monk if their ship was repaired. The monk responded that it believed it was, the aliens tried to take off, and then the ship exploded because it wasn't actually repaired.

In Hitchhiker's Guide, Genuine People Personalities were AIs that tended to be obnoxiously cheerful, neurotic, or hyperactive. Doors with a GPP would sigh with pleasure when they opened and loudly ask if they did a good job if someone told them to open quietly, for example.

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

God ! Douglas Adams was fucking funny. What a shame he didn’t got to see our time

[–] Exatron@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

He had a unique way with words. I sometimes wonder how he'd feel about having essentially predicted how AI turned out.

[–] ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip 59 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Lol, they think the computers in star trek were just LLMs

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago

After Tesseract and now this, it raises a question. Do people that call themselves conservatives have to always be contrarians?

Literally any topic. There were issues that one would think everyone would agree on and they still surprise you.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

the true AI are usually the holograms, or a robotic race but it seems limited. but they are pretty much not as extensively integrated like the Andromeda series, the ship has an AI that is pretty integrated into all the ships systems(can appear as a hologram or as an android, or upload into multiple robots at once) and perform most of the task the crew requires.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 19 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Imagine if the computer on star trek operated the way it does in every episode where the computer is malfunctioning. That's how real-world "AI" works. You ask to go to the bridge and it keeps sending your ass to engineering and ten forward.

Also: They didn't even mention Data who is more AI than even the ship's computer!

[–] Superorbit@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 hours ago

You must be doing something right lmao

[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 hours ago

Being banned from these cesspools should be a badge of honor.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 25 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

lol I got similar treatment by those dipshits a few months ago

[–] seathru@quokk.au 15 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

bdzer0's claim to be anarchist yet wholly embracing AI is some cognitive dissonance that I cannot wrap my head around.

[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 1 points 7 minutes ago

What a strange take. That's like saying you couldn't be trotskyist and embrace industry in 1919.

[–] Famko@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Genuinely my biggest gripe with their entire instance. How do they not realize that by using LLMs you rob yourself of the chance to gain new skills in art or coding?

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 1 points 14 minutes ago

Plus the fact that they are literally sucking up to techbro billionaire oligarchs pushing this nonsense by doing so.

I guess the techbro in them overrules the anarchist.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

they oddlly crossbanned me from multiple comms i dont vist at all, thier reason was a vague"whatabotism" i couldnt find the actual offense, checked the modlogs. so i think they did it like some reddit subs did. i participate din a comm they dint like and just crossbanned me.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 hours ago

Lmao the one Europe one in the middle.

[–] shani66@ani.social 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Man DBzer0 really sucks. That's the one place I've been mass banned from (although it is because there was a troll using my name, but they never even responded to an unban request), I should check if it applies to the ai dumping communities too.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

same here, i checked the modlogs, and it was "troll whabaotism" but i found no original comment/post that triggered it. i think they just banned people who participated in a community they dint like.

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 19 points 7 hours ago

"stable_diffusion_furry"

My dude, you're in a subculture that basically revolves around human art and creativity. Get out of your ass.

Risk management protocol 🀣

Beep Boop Ban

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 21 points 8 hours ago

And yet Star Trek still had to have a human repeat all what the A.I. was saying to make sure it wasn't shite.

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (6 children)

It happens when you post here, you don't even have to interact with their community. Instead they come here, by their own volition, to be angry about us not liking AI and they then decide to ban every name they come across. This community existing is insult enough for them. Thankfully they self-isolate for the most part.

[–] ell1e@leminal.space 11 points 7 hours ago (6 children)

are you saying people here may have been banned by communities without even knowing? fascinating :o I wouldn't even know how to check that

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 15 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I was banned from a whole bunch of AI slop communities for 'persistent trolling' ... but I'd never posted to any of them, so ... yes. They ban you preemptively.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 1 points 9 minutes ago

I got curious and just looked up my profile in the ban log and it seems I am banned as well in a handful of random (same mod in all of them I assume) dbozer communities without having posted in any of them, with the reason given being "Troll account" (no mention of AI).

So yup, just a power mad mod being cultish about their AI-slop, who probably just banned anybody who posts in here.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I mean.. That kind of sounds like they're doing a public service, TBH πŸ˜…

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I’d agree but it’s pretty fucking gross to ban people that have never even visited your community.

I legitimately think anyone here would deserve a ban if they went over there and said shit. We clearly don’t belong but we’re here minding our own business.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the preemptive nature of the ban shows some extreme fragility. It would be like the mods of this channel going to the slop celebration channels and banning anybody who posted there.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

It reminds me of that old Reddit meme when people were banned from /r/Pyongyang

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, but its not a problem. Usually the mod just bans you from their personal AI dumping ground.

Oh nooooooo I'm banned from the septic tank I didn't want to see in the first place oh noooook

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WizardJr@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago

Joke's on them, I hate Star Trek too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 81 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 65 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Communities, not instances. Startrek.website is one instance, lemmy.today is another. An instance hosts communities. Also, no point censoring the names since the modlog is public.

[–] AzuranAurora@piefed.ca 6 points 7 hours ago

The censoring is also kinda readable underneath anyway, so it accomplished nothing even if the modlog wasn't public.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 23 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

This isn't about AI - that's just an excuse.

What they really didn't want was a Tribble infestation, and well, given your username...you can see why they might want you to keep your distance...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί