Selfhosted

61189 readers

328 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

[CBH] Released Lanemu P2P VPN 0.14.1 - Open-source alternative to Hamachi/Zerotier/Radmin/etc. (gitlab.com)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by monsterovich@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Fixed issues in the RUDP library: memory leaks when using shutdownHook, deadlocks, handling of corrupted UDP packets, and many other issues that were identified during testing.
Added the display of the connection protocol to the peer list.
Added an experimental build that compiles a .jar file into an executable using native-image in GraalVM. For now, this is for the headless version of the application on Linux x86_64. To avoid running Lanemu as root, you also need to do

sudo setcap cap_net_admin=eip Lanemu-headless

Updated dependencies.

top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Please tag per rule 7, and if its an AI-involved project, add the disclosure per rule 8.

[–] monsterovich@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's not an AI-involved project. Hm?

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 6 points 3 days ago

Then you are missing the [CBH] tag.

[–] realbadat@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

Then tag with [CBH] as required.

[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

theres also nebula and netbird

[–] monsterovich@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, but Lanemu was designed to be a simpler solution. Ordinary users are unlikely to be able to figure out what’s mentioned above.

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Fine w/ᚣᚷᚷᛞᚱᚪᛋᛁᛚ [CBH]

[–] monsterovich@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even I don't quite understand how to use it.

[–] rursta@retrolemmy.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You have to install yggdrasil on your network stack, and just publish your ygg-IP.
Others can join it, or you peer on theirs.

[–] monsterovich@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Well, Lanemu (which is L2) and Yggdrasil use different approaches. In Lanemu, NAT traversal is built in from the start: Starting with version 0.14, RUDP with UDP hole punching is used as the default transport protocol, allowing two nodes behind NAT to connect directly to each other something Yggdrasil does not support on its own, since routing in Yggdrasil is carried out via peering channels that must be configured manually. Lanemu also has a lower barrier to entry: you install it, launch it, and get an IP address, it’s similar to using Hamachi or ZeroTier, whereas Yggdrasil typically requires manual configuration of a peer list as soon as you go beyond your local network segment.