this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
205 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

87897 readers
5035 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Those big corps sure lust after subscriptions. Damn those old paper magazines for giving them yet another unoriginal idea!

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

$3.5 trillion. No low ball offers. I know what I've got.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No low ball

Ironic considering what I'm getting

[–] Sauvandu60@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dumb coonsomer would get this dumb products and then wait for next new dumb products.

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Well Apple and Samsung can kiss my hairy hoop.

[–] randombullet@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Didn't Google used to have Pixel Pass where you get a new phone every 2 years? Then they killed it before the 2 year cycle was up?

Imaging companies promising you a new phone after 2 years and then canceling the program at 22 months and then said oops, here $50 store credit...

[–] darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm sure carriers still do payment plans

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BipolarSilence@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 month ago

...Motorola please pls pls sign deal with graphene OS

[–] dsilverz@catodon.rocks 4 points 1 month ago

Rent your phone so you can rent an app that'll allow you to access your internet banking and pay for all the rents, including the rental of payment services for rental paying?

No, thanks, I'll cut through this whole Rube-Goldberg machinery of "living in society", straight into applying for a leasing for my next six-feet-under wooden house instead. I'd love the view, grass and chrysanthema at my roof, buzzards as my faithful company (whether it'll be part of the legalese leasing terms or not, Mother Nature doesn't care about that, and neither do I as I'd be long gone (or should I say, long bones) at that point).

!technology@lemmy.world

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

How about you guys kiss the pimpliest part of my ass instead?

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honest question, what the fuck happens with phones that companies buy back? Is it for recycling? I can't imagine that makes them any money, so is the bet just that its worth it for then to subsidize the cost of the new phone to keep you buying new ones more often? That doesnt feel like it adequately explains the practice

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alexquiniou@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Hummm ... Go f yourself.

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Groooooss. You'll own nothing and you'll like it.

[–] xSikes@feddit.online 2 points 1 month ago

I want an essential phone. Not too basic and not too “smart”.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's time for some right-of-first-sale legislation that kills off the subscription-for-everything scam.

  1. It should be illegal for a lack of a subscription to prevent operation of something you've bought.

  2. Same goes for requiring connectivity.

  3. If the subscription service terminates, reverse-engineering to maintain continuing operations should be protected by law, and the manufacturer should be required to provide the specifications to the public.

  4. DRM to prevent access to subscribable features should be illegal.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This is basically how my company gives us our phones. And i think it’s now our less standard

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›