this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
84 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

86860 readers
4138 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
84
Social media algorithms shape the beliefs people form /// Even small changes to content curation algorithms can shape what people come to believe—for better or worse. (www.mpg.de)
submitted 1 day ago by homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1305963/social-media-algorithms-shape-the-beliefs-people-form-even-small-changes-to-content-cura

Research Paper.

  • Algorithms shape the beliefs people form: Simple changes to content curation algorithms can affect beliefs, consensus, and belief accuracy.
  • Personalized engagement-based ranking can be problematic: Although users perceive these feeds positively, they tend to lead to less consensus and less accurate beliefs.
  • Consensus is possible: Bridging-based ranking can help promote consensus by surfacing content that receives approval across different groups.
  • Belief accuracy can be improved: Intelligence-based ranking can promote more accurate collective and individual judgments.
  • Small algorithmic changes can have large effects: Simple changes to how posts are sampled and ranked can substantially influence the beliefs people form.
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

lead people to form erroneous beliefs ... whether they promote consensus or belief accuracy ... more polarized and less accurate beliefs ... help users find more mutual understanding on these platforms ... content that receives approval across different groups is promoted ... bridge divides and encourage positive interactions across diverse audiences ... bridging-based ranking can promote consensus ... elicit belief updates that benefit collective accuracy ... improve both collective accuracy and average individual accuracy ... aligning them more closely with socially desirable goals

I don't know what's creepier: a polarized society but with a more diverse view on topics, or a cohesive society with an eerily uniform view instead. Polarization is problematic, but so is thought-policing. I would argue feeds shouldn't be algorithmically determined, but composed of content by channels the user has explicitly chosen to subscribe to; and a separate explore feature for interest-based suggestions, without creepy "this is what most people agree with, and so should you" course-correction measures.

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is just one of the many ways the US Epstein class manipulates ordinary people to believe all their lies about other nations and their leaders/systems. It's coordinated and a part of the 'Manufacturing Consent' campaign that makes people very angry at the societal systems and nation enemies of the Epstein class, and allow them to attack Iran, China, Venezuela etc, and yes, Russia !

The censorship and manipulation on US/western media (social or msm) are sick ! Even here on Lemmy, propagandized people keep posting elite controlled western media articles and their deliberate misinformation.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Russia is firmly in bed with them, don't kid yourself.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's why the West, spearheaded as usual by the US, sorta colonized Ukraine and made it their new FOB against Russia, because both governments are in bed with each other, lol. If you're saying that Russia also uses disinfo, propaganda and social media for their own goals, sure, but they're not the same and they're certainly not as damaging (Nazi/white supremacy apology/Zionism is Western stuff, for example).

[–] db2@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Username checks out halfway.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The other side of that coin is just another nations Epstein class manipulating ordinary people.

[–] TheLegendaryAssholeOfJushinLiger@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Reddit is currently engaging with this kind of behavior to drive people rightwards.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

For . . . better??

[–] EliteCloneMike@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For the betterment of the shareholders. :/

Edit: But seriously, what do they mean by “better”? Maybe there was potential and still is to educate people and improve critical thinking skills to assess what they are being fed instead of blindly trusting algorithmic output. Thats more of a fundamental issue than the algorithms though.