this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
824 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

86860 readers
4051 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sixty minutes. That’s how long it took for a private Snapchat message to travel from Kristen Volpe’s phone to the FBI to the deputies standing in her elementary school hallway. On January 29, 2025, the 22-year-old student teacher at John L. Hensey Elementary in Washington, Illinois, vented to her boyfriend and two roommates — three people total — after a student closed her laptop mid-class and wiped her lesson plan. She referenced shooting the student or the school. She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor.

No student reported her. No parent. No coworker. The flag was entirely automated. Snapchat’s policy permits voluntary emergency disclosures to law enforcement — no warrant required — when the platform determines imminent harm exists. The algorithm makes that initial call. Think of it like your Ring doorbell deciding to call 911 on its own, except the doorbell is reading your text messages.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 4 hours ago

So the lesson to the rest of us is DO NOT USE SNAPCHAT especially for private messaging.

I use Signal, was pressed to do so by privacy-minded friends and have pressed other friends to adopt the client.

So long as you don't accidentally include Jeffrey Goldberg in your chat, you're okay.

[–] elevenbones@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

Seems like something i would [Ctrl]+[S]

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 59 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Questions for the ridiculous number of people on here who are perfectly willing to give up their right to privacy because you believe it makes schools and other places safer:

Have you read the 50+ page user agreement for your cell phone company? How about the user agreements of every app that has access to your cell phone, your PC mic or apps that have access to your files? Late model cars have microphones too, as do TV remotes. Microsoft has access to everything on your Windows PC. I'd give 100 to 1 odds that 99% of you haven't read any of those user agreements OR the UA for private chat apps you are using. Likewise are you sure any cloud storage you're using isn't scanning your documents for forbidden phrases?

Since you haven't read every word of each and every user agreement and think it keeps schools safe, you should be just fine with the fact that EVERYTHING you say or write may be available to law enforcement, even if you're talking to yourself while sitting on the toilet in your home. If you mutter that you'd like to kill someone or burn something misheard as a school building to the ground you are just fine with AI flagging it and the police knocking on your door in an hour, right? You'll also be just fine with losing your career and your job never being able to find another one, right? Right? After all, other people never know WTF someone dangerous and violent is going to do.

The number of people on here who are perfectly willing to give up all their rights and have their private communications monitored for something that is nothing more than security theater is unbelievable.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago

Real US judges have ruled that click-wrapped ToSes are not legally binding, since they commonly are bypassed, and app developers use dark patterns to discourage end users from reading them.

Also, ToSes and EULAs are notoriously verbose and difficult to read. People with college level reading skills struggle with them.

So no, blaming the end user is not appropriate here.

[–] anarchyrabbit@lemmy.world 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

My gawd. People are missing the issue here. You described it pretty well OP.

Yes there are weirdos and they must be caught. Algorithms are getting out of hand though, targeting their wrong people and not the weirdos. There is a massive privacy issue here. Must every text that we send be accessible by the government? I don't buy the argument of "I have nothing to hide". When you are in the hot seat they will use any info they can get their hands on. make an offside joke they will use it.

Fuck this shit.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago

Even people who have "nothing to hide" aren't safe.

I've lost track of the number of articles about people who were wrongly accused by "AI" camera systems or flagged for arrest because their (relatively common-seeming) name matches or is close to an entirely different person who is a legitimate suspect. Some of those people have been jailed for weeks and have lost their jobs over what amounts to a clerical error.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 hours ago

"automated"

There is noaccurated and efficient automation when it comes to people. Sure you can flag some phrase that gets sent but unless you know the person there is no way you can say if it's a real threat or not. You will need someone to go through months of messages and phone their friends and family to understand if it's a real potential threat or just a joke/dark humour/bad day.

Having automatic phrases or words that might alert FBI about an imminent threat is just stupid.

If anything put them on a watchlist where an investigator is sent out, but that's it.

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 47 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Is it legal for a service to be called private when it is programmatically shared with law enforcement?

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 30 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It shouldn't be. Everyone needs to wise up to life in a police state now. Right now.

[–] mangobanana@discuss.online 4 points 8 hours ago

We are about 20 years too late to wake up

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago

Welcome to post Constitution USA.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

know what platform doesn't have this problem? simplex.

that's why neonazis are using it and why you should too.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I hatr how some prople on here seem to not understand that nazis and other prosecuted groups using a platform is a good sign the platform is secure.

[–] gagcar@lemmus.org 2 points 3 hours ago

Or that it’s not and it’s a good way for the government to keep tabs on them à la ANOM. Me and my boys have been using PiGN. Find a bird, attach a note, hope it gets there. Anything else is a crapshoot about actually being secure.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And this is why I've moved away from snap, and most other platforms, I'm back to texting and using carrier pigeons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Who the fuck still uses Snapchat?

Ditch that shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 51 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Marvel at how AI stopped this non-existent threat, while also giving advice on the best way to kill yourself, or get the highest kill score in a mass shooting, or hack into other corporations.

Sure, this tech isn't ever going to start directly killing people it has determined are a problem, flipping off life support machines, crashing autonomous vehicles, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 16 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

I fully agree with how all of this is authoritarian bullshit but I can't escape that nagging feeling that this too is about the US, the only country in the world where these shootings are daily occurrences; I get that people get ichy about even jokes like these

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

And yet, if the US cares so much how come it doesn't take more comprehensive steps to prevent them?

It's only ever invasions of privacy to feed directly to law enforcement. And they won't even enter the building to confront active shooters.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I fear that we are training our population to suppress the signs, to just "go off" without warnings. If we deploy SWAT every time somebody repeats some violent threat joke they heard in 785 movies and TV shows over the past 20 years, people are going to get better at filtering that - and actual signs that they're about to "go postal."

As for that, what happens when I'm watching some indie movie from a DVD that Alexa doesn't recognize and Alexa hears the character in the movie plotting to do some (better not say it here in detail) very plausible copycat of something like Timothy McVeigh and his little truck bomb? Alexa mistakes that audio snippet for actual people in the house and reports it...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 95 points 16 hours ago (10 children)

It's HEARTENING to Know these Platforms have the ABILITY to STOP atrocities and Almost Always choose NOT too! <3

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›