this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
814 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

86860 readers
4002 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sixty minutes. That’s how long it took for a private Snapchat message to travel from Kristen Volpe’s phone to the FBI to the deputies standing in her elementary school hallway. On January 29, 2025, the 22-year-old student teacher at John L. Hensey Elementary in Washington, Illinois, vented to her boyfriend and two roommates — three people total — after a student closed her laptop mid-class and wiped her lesson plan. She referenced shooting the student or the school. She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor.

No student reported her. No parent. No coworker. The flag was entirely automated. Snapchat’s policy permits voluntary emergency disclosures to law enforcement — no warrant required — when the platform determines imminent harm exists. The algorithm makes that initial call. Think of it like your Ring doorbell deciding to call 911 on its own, except the doorbell is reading your text messages.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 95 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It's HEARTENING to Know these Platforms have the ABILITY to STOP atrocities and Almost Always choose NOT too! <3

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 61 points 14 hours ago (8 children)

yeah.

Its amazing how they never once stopped an actual act of violence, but someone venting about a stressful day gets a full swat deployment.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 137 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Now that you know everything on Snapchat is going through active automated filtering, consider what Snapchat has chosen NOT to flag and is allowing to flow freely, like sex trafficking and the sale of minors.

As unfair and life-changing as this event has been for this young teacher, I think the actual story of what Snapchat (and every other digital communication method) is reading/tracking yet allowing is a much, much bigger story. And dirtier. With billionaires and pedophiles and all manner of nasty allowables we do not yet know.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 56 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

There's a reason why Donald and his friends in Washington have all of their discussions on Signal.

Also, if you're not already, just assume every app and device are spying on you.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 47 points 17 hours ago (16 children)

Man that was a stupid thing to joke about on a service like Snapchat

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Mearcfara@lemmy.ml -3 points 5 hours ago

Why did you choose such a clickbatey title?

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 383 points 23 hours ago (39 children)

The amount of people in this thread that seem to think invasion of privacy is cool to police thought crime is honestly shocking. The subject and subject matter are completely irrelevant.

In addition, teachers are fucking people and venting and joking in private with close friends is sacrosanct.

[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

my knee jerk reaction was thinking the same as you but this very paticular case, i am not sure. i havent made up my mind.

lets talk about opposite ends and then talk about snapchat

  1. if a person is sitting in mcdonalds saying they want to shoot up a school, we wouldnt think it weird if someone called the authorities. in fact peoples lives have been saved because someone overheard something

  2. in contrast, a private conversation on signal should never be read and everyone should stop using it if it is read.

now snap chat is neither a public place or an encrypted communication app. it falls in between. it is a social media app. would you be worried if it was facebook? i keep thinking about it. why shouldnt snapchat report it? keep on mind that i have never used snapchat, facebook, or instagram and i thought snapchat was basically for sending pictures. (i am older). but, honest question, why would people expect privacy on snapchat? again, i havent used it and not as "hip", so i am genuinely asking and this isnt a loaded question

load more comments (38 replies)
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 26 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

The statute is constructed in an unusual way because it doesn't require that the threat is transmitted to someone who believes it. It says:

(a) A person commits disorderly conduct when he or she knowingly:

...

(3.5) Transmits or causes to be transmitted in any manner a threat of destruction of a school building or school property, or a threat of violence, death, or bodily harm directed against persons at a school, school function, or school event, whether or not school is in session;

Laws against transmitting threats are usually written in a manner that excludes jokes sent to friends who understand that they are jokes.

Also, use Signal. Signal will not call the cops when you send dumb jokes to your friends. There are no good reasons for most people to not use Signal.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›