This meme is so confusing, do I read it top to bottom or bottom to top?
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
166 points (99.4% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
41185 readers
4076 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
That's a lot like John Wick. Aww, doggie. Kill Russians. Aww, doggie.
I like all that. Really liked what she did to that one jackass at the end--- made me like her a bit more.
Did not like dog being hurt, dog being left, dog almost dying. Did not like! 😭
Edit: omg I just realized why the Cons hated this movie! It's in the second line of the OP's post.
Her suit also included shorts under her skirt. SHORTS! Isn't that outrageous? How are they supposed to get pantyshots now?! /S
I think next DCU movie should just be Krypto. That’s Avatar levels of money.
Krypto killing sex traffickers
This one time I got too high and sat down to watch an entire season of Krypton. I think I was about 2/3 through the season before I realized I hadn't seen Krypto yet inn a series about him.... I giggled and continued watching. Anywho, I totally agree they should option Krypto!
Except the dog was poisoned and sad. It wasn't "awww doggie" it was "awww sad doggie." Also Supergirl didn't have her powers for like 3/4ths of the movie (due to her character's own stupidity). Like they couldn't write a decent story if she had powers.
23-year-old with abandonment and self-worth issues behaves less than reasonably, more at 11.
It's a general complaint I have about some of the mainstream attempts at Superman. "We've got to make him/her weaker." Is a common theme that has been done way too many times. Because in these people's minds, there is nothing interesting that can happen if Superman/Supergirl actually has their powers and wins. The drama, for these non-Superman fans writing the script, is in the hero losing their powers. They don't actually understand what's appealing about Superman in the first place.
I know what you're talking about but here it's rooted in actual character development. Nobody took her powers away, she wasn't taking care of herself, was reckless, and suffered the consequences. Sure at some point there was Kryptonite involved but even that could've been avoided if she had been more level-headed and less self-destructive.
I would like to see a situation that cannot be solved by strength alone. It feels like lazy writing to take that strength away. Kryptonite as a plot device is kinda old. But if you use it for a few seconds here or there, like Superman (2025) that's great. What I definitely do not want is a movie about Superman without his powers. Powerless for a situation? Yes! Powerless for 75% of the movie? No!
Good, because this movie isn't about either Superman without his powers or Supergirl without her powers. It's about a very young adult sabotaging herself because of her pain and overcoming her self-imposed restrictions to save others.
That's pretty much all a movie needs, really.
I'm a little more interested in it now TBH
Good! If you're interested in the sort of story, it's a solid movie.
Can someone explain what the aww doggie part means? Is it sex scenes?
No, it's Supergirl's dog, who is cute, then possibly dying, so they are non-sexy awws (either adorable or sadness awws, depending).
She has a cute doggie, it is the most harmless and wholesome of "aww"s you could imagine.
😂
I liked her better in the Mad Max movies...
