this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
585 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

87079 readers
4088 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bots don't generate money you dough brains.

[–] tengkuizdihar@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

why focus on money? what about culture, humanity, and actual interesting interaction between humans?

ah, I forgot humanity have devolved into beings of statistics. Leaving feelings, positive long term planning, and religion behind.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I believe it is an attempt to use an argument that they will care about. You could write a brilliant piece about how that many bots hurt culture and society but if the ones you want to convince don't gaf about either of those, they probably won't even read what you have to say, let alone change anything because of it.

Or, more likely, they won't even see anything here, at which point that comment becomes more of a "they aren't even very good at what they want to be good at".

Like from my pov, the top of the corporate world doesn't just not care about those things but is actively trying to destroy them because they think they'll do better in a world where none of those things are as they currently are.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago

If only that last one was true.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Bots don't do that either.

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm looking forward to an open mesh outside the realm of government and corporate control

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Their was a video about how to start building something like that, I'll edit this with a link once I get back home from work.

[–] cunnililgus@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How would that prevent bot traffic?

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 1 day ago

I think the bot traffic is the open mesh.

[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (4 children)

People are just going to get sick of the Internet, if they haven't already, and start to look at it like a necessary evil they have to use to do certain things instead of what it once was which was fun and exciting. It's sad.

A much larger segment of people than you think are already off. You just don't hear about them, because, well, they aren't online. Lmao

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep. The internet is becoming what a mailbox in real life is. An abused gateway that has a narrow set of legitimate uses.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 1 day ago

At least we're not burning dead dinosaurs (and plankton) to deliver dead trees.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We will have private mesh nets

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Overlay networks are also feasable.

[–] kupojoe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

funded by whom? (legitimate question)

[–] cloudshouter@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Currently private users and enthusiasts. As networks grow, there will probably be universities joining. Eventually corporations will start marketing plug and play equipment while selling access to server space and long distance connections. Other businesses will join and finance their services by selling subscriptions, advertising, and user data. Various government agencies will add hardware they can also use to track traffic. Someone will inevitably bring in bots, AI models, and internet connected devices. After that someone will coin the term “dead mesh network theory” and all the nerdlings will start developing the next knitted network or something.

[–] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 day ago

The catalyst there is businesses (and to a degree governments).

I used to pay attention to my physical mail. Then it was all "junk mail" and the signal-to-noise ratio got hard to manage.

I migrated the important stuff to "electronic mail", where I had a curated list of people and entities that sent me items, so I could focus on things that were important. Then my address/mailbox became common knowledge and that filled with "spam".

I started using SMS/text for the important stuff. But that also became a common place to send me stuff I didn't care about, so I used specific apps on my phone that had permission to notify me when something needed attention, and now my phone gives me so many notifications I just ignore them all.

Our attention is the prize, and it won't matter where our attention goes: The businesses will follow.

The same will hold true for connectivity. If the current internet becomes a wasteland and we migrate to Mesh, then it's only a matter of time before corporate interests take that over too; then knitted, or fabric, or the glob.

The solution will be protections for personal identity and privacy, which have been and will be fought tooth-and-nail by the companies because they want that info so they can be where our attention is so they can make profit. I think we can also fight the profit motive, but that'll be harder than getting protections in law... so small steps.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grahamja@reddthat.com 25 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Guess I'll just have to hang out with humans in the physical world.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

You won't be able to tell which of your neighbours was replaced by a metal mimic, and got shipped off to the Soylent factory.

Peter Thiel did mention humans will end up like horses, going to the glue factory.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We'll just destroy the environment and privatize the land that isn't.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 1 day ago

In the early 1900s the Collier family made themselves a big pile of money and bought what later became Collier County, Florida. Pretty much all of it was privately owned by them, along with a collection of every type of Porsche ever made and a bunch of other "gee, what can I do with ALL this money" activities... Property taxes encouraged them to sell the land off and now what once was a private family "farm" about 100 years ago is now home to over 400,000 people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want the bots to start scamming each other now.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You should watch Kitboga’s scam bots handle scammers; it’s gravy.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One of the very rare moments of AI being used completely for good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Marija_@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bowkys need humans, but humans don't need Bowkys.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 1 day ago

Are you sure? Co-dependent symbiotic relationships evolve in nature all the time - starting at the macro scale with plants and animals.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

World governments will be delighted to find that they've driven their populations off of the internet. As much as they'll hate being engaged in 24/7 automated cyber warfare to stop their power plants exploding.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. Governments love the internet. It keeps people distracted.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

It was keeping them distracted, until it started either letting them foment or driving them insane. They'd prefer you just consume media and leave them to their business, these days.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 216 points 3 days ago (14 children)

awesome, then we can remove all the ads, no? because bots don't purchase things, no?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 67 points 3 days ago (18 children)

Last year, you’d be correct. This year, bots DO purchase things. They also download and run things. Some marketers have gotten wise and have adjusted SEO and general product advertising to appeal to bots.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] TransNeko@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

already there mate.

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 67 points 3 days ago (38 children)

The weirdest part won’t be bots outnumbering humans: It’ll be bots writing articles for bots, bots summarising them for other bots, bots commenting underneath, and bots measuring the engagement. … Meanwhile three actual humans are somewhere wondering why the internet suddenly feels so empty.

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 33 points 3 days ago

It’ll be bots writing articles for bots, bots summarising them for other bots, bots commenting underneath, and bots measuring the engagement.

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Hope these bots are paying customers, then.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 34 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I'm reminded of the episode of TNG where they trapped Moriarity in a simulation so he would think he had taken over the ship.

Maybe we can just have an internet just for billionaires where they have AI produce internet content so they can advertise useless AI products to AI bots run by other billionaires while the rest of us go on with our normal lives in the real world?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

There's also the fact that an internet full of bots, AI slop, and privacy risks is making more people pull away from the online world. In our poll, 97% of people said the internet today was a hellscape compared to its early days, and it looks like things are only going to get worse.

Looks like the cure is inherent in the disease. Anyone else remember the early 90s when Usenet was just text-based fun and then some motherfucker thought it was a grand idea to run ads? I do, and it's been downhill ever since.

It's sad that it has come to this, but as usual a handful of greedy fuckers have ruined it for the rest of us. (My personal opinion is that big tech could have arrested this downhill slide at any point, even from back in the first days of email spam, but have chosen to monetize it every step of the way instead.)

Real humans are already individually opting out, one by one, as we each personally get sick of the slop and realize it's just not helping anymore. For myself I'm only on intermittently, I've ditched all social media, Lemmy is all I participate in regularly now beyond the odd comment here and there, and that seems about right for me at this time.

I adjust it regularly, often just by going offline for days, but I had to see the problem before I could change it. I think that's where a lot of people are, just now seeing it for the first time as a real problem affecting their quality of life directly.

But like any other addiction, the point of turning is different for everyone. These fuckers on the other end, filling everything with slop and running bots without end, are just speeding it all up.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›