this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
508 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41839 readers
4809 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 93 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Its not about converting the crackpots, its about pushing back on insane bullshit so others are less likely to become crackpots.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 30 points 1 month ago

This is why dissent is important. Visibility.

[–] cb900f_bodhi@fedinsfw.app 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Agreed. Where do you draw the line between downvoting and potentially feeding the trolls? I'm having a hard time with that. When someone is acting like an ignorant contrarian, I'm inclined to ignore them.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I start off with the logic, and when they double down on bullshit and toxicity I just keep spotlighting the terrible rhetoric with no substance. In a "like damn dude, your 3rd grade teacher would be disappointed in your writing" way.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You have to out dumb them and take away their argument.

Vaccines cause autism? It’s caused by aliens to force us to build another pyramid so they can land their ship here to harvest the squirrels.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I hold myself to slightly higher standards. I'm not above insulting and throwing toxicity back, but I am honest about it to stop it from undercutting my argumentation.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I feel like there's a certain point where you're no longer pushing back against the crackpots and just arguing with a brick wall.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

You're never going to change their minds. That's not the point. The point is to push back against them. So people who see the interaction will see the rebuttal and the pushback against the insanity. That's the important part.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 month ago

I'm not writing to the crackpot I'm responding to. I'm writing to the lurkers on the fence wondering if he has a valid point.

That might be why I'm so used to replies that look like long-form essays. It takes a lot more words to explain nuance and invite critical thought than it does to shitpost.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've had cases where I've moved the needle. Got someone to move from "I hate communism!!" to "I see where you're coming from. Capitalism has problems, I admit".

For some people, you need to let them feel heard and avoid being too antagonistic.

Some people are just trolls, though.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 1 month ago

I managed to convert a "god put dinosaur fossils in the ground 6000 years ago to test us," person once, although she was already questioning things so I led her to the right answer.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

You don't change the view of the person you are arguing with on the internet, you are putting a red flag so that would-be readers don't fall into the rabbit hole.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Online debate is fun. I don't care if it falls short of solving the worlds problems.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Online debate isn't fun. I care if it falls short of solving the world's problems.

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Online debate is fun

Most online disagreements can hardly be characterized as a "debate". Most of the time it's some contrarian shitlord arguing in bad faith, fishing for gotchas, moving goalposts, refusing to acknowledge reality, and/or pretending your posts mean something other than what they say.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm not a crackpot, I saw that gnome with my own two eyes they're fucking real and they're plotting against us.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If you saw anyone else hanging around a garden or forest you might say they're gardening, foraging, vibing, touching grass, or waiting until their mortal body is reclaimed by nature. But when it's a gnome they have to be plotting?

If you treat them like you would any other magical creature, spent some time to get to know them, you'd see just how wrong you were. Spend a little less time pondering your orb and little more time out in the real world.

Besides, if you examine the statistics, you'd see that skinwalkers are the real problem. Despite making up only... But I can tell you aren't ready to be red potioned on that yet.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Bro I am literally a skinwalker and I can't believe you'd say something this racist to me. You know those statistics are skewed by the ministry to push their agenda.

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Well, the alternative is a bunch of crackpot comments with no pushback (except downvotes) and 3-10x less actually-decent-takes

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago

I've found that, while you can't convince a crackpot of anything, you can study them like a scientific specimen and it can be quite interesting

[–] Shindo66@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everyone just wants an echo chamber and the internet is happy to oblige

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

You're so right.

[–] EffortlessGrace@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

​"Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired.

  • Jonathan Swift, A Letter to a Young Gentleman, Lately Enter'd Into Holy Orders, 1721 C.E.
[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My rule to live by (and this seems to trigger people online for some reason whenever I say it): never engage with comments online. I'll post a comment, but >99% of the time there is no reason to reply. Someone has to make it abundantly clear that they are responding in good faith to warrant a response. My life has been much better since I started doing this and I would strongly recommend everyone try it out.

[–] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

I enjoy the banter back and forth until the person doubles down, then it’s over

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Almost 100% of the replies you receive are in bad faith? Friend...

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The number of threads that I’ve just completely abandoned on .ml when I realize I’m trying to reason with morons is too damn high.

[–] gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Going to .ml looking for an enlightened discussion is like going to the zoo looking for a glory hole.

[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I blocked ml just this morning after such an exchange. It's noticeable immediately 😂

[–] Blurntout@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I wonder if the crackpots ever ask themselves am I the crackpot?

Asking for a friend

[–] MrSusan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That reminds me, I really must check my inbox

[–] CallMeAl@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Having a real discussion online seems exceedingly rare. Like where each person really wants to find the flaws in their own position, to either strengthen it or learn why it can't be.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

It's rare but it's there, and when you genuinely find someone who will take your points and offer their perspective in return it can be a glorious thing.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

It lives in the internet it lives in the internet oh god help me it lives in the internet

[–] Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

no, it never does, i mean, these people somehow delude themselves into thinking it might, but... but it might work for us.

[–] join@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the dark times of late 2023 I had long discussions with Israel apologists on here, now they don’t seem to exist anymore. Question is, if they actually changed their mind or if they just left, and if my comments had anything to do with that anyway ofc.

[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

They probably got called up

[–] jlow@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Ahh yes the crackpot belief that it is wrong to support a genocide regardless of who is in power.

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

I never commented much, apart from here and in reddit, when it still was a thing. Currently I try to avoid even looking into the comment section. It' just not worth it.

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 0 points 1 month ago

How else are they supposed to virtue signal?

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

It was never about winning.

It was always about getting shit off on strangers for self-gratification, and public shaming for reprehensible behaviours/ beliefs.

[–] MrOtingocni@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, I won't.

Fuck your "reason", people covet their own logical prowess but in reality they didn't come to their views on their own nor their way of seeing things on their own. In fact, it's a weakness borrowed from others, based on flawed methodology and is what got you into the situation you're in now.

I ain't teaching a class, believe me or don't, I dgaf.

99% of people are mostly interested in confirming their own myopic view, to the degree that they will commit violence to ensure it. If someone reaches out a hand, I will grab it, but that's exceedingly rare and it's not my day job to fish randos out of their own ignorance un-asked.

[–] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When you tell lemmy users that teachers joking about shooting their students is bad, actually.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That one was probably more about surveillance

[–] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, they made it very clear they wanted teachers to be able to "joke" about shooting their students.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Well yeah if you aren't being surveiled you can joke or even "joke" about anything as long as someone doesn't take it seriously enough to report you