this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
395 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

87312 readers
4582 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] joe@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (25 children)

Any pause will have to be a global treaty; the unfortunate reality is that we're in an arms race now, and despite Sanders' threats otherwise, I don't think there is going to be much will to pause in the US while China keeps developing.

And to be clear, I think it would be every wise to pause development and, afterwards, keep the pace slow. We know how to make "AI" more capable, but we don't know how to make it stay aligned with human goals. The technology is useful and isn't going anywhere, but that doesn't mean we have to develop it as quickly as possible without regard to the real dangers it brings with it.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 34 points 1 week ago (30 children)

Any pause will have to be a global treaty

Which is why tech CEOs love to promote it. They know it'll never happen.

We know how to make “AI” more capable, but we don’t know how to make it stay aligned with human goals.

"Alignment" is almost entirely a myth cooked up by AI companies who want to make their word generators sound scarier than they are. There's no such thing: the next word generator generates next word. It's unpredictable because it's built that way. "Hallucination" and "going rogue", all poor terms and pathetic attempts to fearmonger and humanize, are identical functions to "working" and "aligning".

The technology... isn’t going anywhere

The "it's just inevitable" cliche rears its ugly head again.

[–] Mathium05@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That cliche is the worst. If applied to anything else you can see how absurd it is. Like NFTs aren't going anywhere, crime isn't going anywhere, etc.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (27 children)

Except NFTs were never used to nearly even close to the same amount as AI, it had much less usecases and the one that did "catch on" was idiotic.

Crime is a symptom of a problem, not a technological advancement, apples and oranges.

AI the tool is never going away in the same way the internet is never going away. (Barring our entire civilization collapses and we lose knowledge/connectivity/life lmao)

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] riskable@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's beyond "an arms race." AI has become a commodity that's everywhere and it's being used and developed by zillions of completely different groups all over the world with wildly varying use cases and completely different goals.

At this point, trying to ban it would be like trying to ban dandelions from growing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 36 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Stop with the threats and just fucking do it. This shit is why everyone thinks the Dems are useless.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (8 children)

It's not a threat, it's a plea.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If he can get senate action on AI then why can't he get senate action on all the other plethora of crap happening to us right now?

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 week ago

He cant, but he wants to. Which is important.

We should never take something away from an action with good intentions, just because others want to stop him.

Thats not how we get the change in the end. Because someday it might succeed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Stop the investment, most importantly.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] itsjustachairmary@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

They bought the senate Bernie

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What Senate action will he take? Have a hearing when the senators will try to get sound bites in for reelection?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (7 children)

This is playing into their hand. “Oh your tech is so amazing and powerful and must be paused!”

Nah. It’s a bullshit bubble that’s threatening to tear down world order, or what’s left of it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 week ago

This comment section is the dumbest thing I've ever read.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did he buy into their hype claims of sentient AI?

[–] corbindallas@fedinsfw.app 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

oh good luck with that bernie.. while he's not wrong, there's too much money passing hands for this to be a threat

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›