this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
21 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

4188 readers
184 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No pics of text

Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

But half the party relies on that money for their reelection. How will they win without it? It wouldn't be "fair".

[–] human@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 hours ago

I feel like only banning it in primaries just lets them save up and über-bribe whoever makes it to the general.

[–] Pennywise@quokk.au 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So Sanders wants Republicans to win?

If we can get money out of politics it absolutely needs to be for both parties, Bernie. Fuck this you go low we go high bullshit.

[–] araneae@beehaw.org 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Pennywise@quokk.au 1 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

I know what primaries are.

How does that change the fact that PACs put advertisements out there to get in front of ALLpeople's faces to get them out to vote (in primaries and the general) to change people's minds to attract them to democratic candidates at all?

If you don't start building that momentum before the primaries, it can be near impossible to have it when the general comes along.

Look at Kamala Failedus. Didn't even win a fucking primary.