this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
214 points (98.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41346 readers
4777 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 25 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Me, a Meth Addict, constantly trying to blow meth smoke in your face and stab you with meth needles: "You're going to have a pretty hard time getting by without it!"

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 24 minutes ago

I guess we just have to accept meth being forced into everything because the cat is out of the bag!

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 8 points 50 minutes ago

Last time I sullied my fingers with a copilot prompt, it decided lobster was vegan so I immediately scrapped that idea and went back to real intelligence. I would be 100.00% delighted if "AI" disappeared.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 46 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

I use AI at work everyday. If it went away the only thing that would change is I’d just go back to googling stuff

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 17 minutes ago

And if googling went away I’d just go back to those giant books with the animals on them.

[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 23 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Hey there buddy, wanna overthrow the prime minister of Malaysia with me?

[–] vrek@programming.dev 8 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

As soon as you answer "but why models?"

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Mail Models

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 29 minutes ago

Buttery males!

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago

sames. That said, if AI went away, we have a few already-deployed systems that would go poof too. They increase throughput of the humans doing real work (we're not building reverse centaurs here). Since we implemented them, we've not needed to hire more.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

This is the 3rd of 4th time recently that I've heard someone, directly or indirectly, describe AI like meth. The first one was Hank Green when he said something along the lines of getting hooked on 'being able to get things done faster,' which is exactly how many people end up meth-heads.

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 2 points 14 minutes ago
[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 minutes ago

Honestly I don’t need ai, but time is money,

I can survive ai but a lot of things are time consuming

So yes, I rarely use ai, honestly ai kinda sucks

It’s time to heavily regulate ai

[–] Epp@lemmus.org 4 points 49 minutes ago

I would be very sad if it went away. It can perform tasks that are otherwise impossible without the expense of incredible amounts of the most valuable of all resources: time.

Thankfully I have it setup locally, so it's not truly a potential outcome.

[–] IckabodKobain@feddit.online 13 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I'm 50. I would do just fine without AI like I did when we didn't have the Internet. I'll adjust. It might be a pain without GPS, Google Maps. Being without a cell phone would be a big one for me as well. It's not like we have pay phones anymore. And I would have to go back to pagers/beepers. But i would manage either way.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The loss of AI would barely be noticable for the average person. A bunch of developers would have a bad day trying to remove all that integration they were forced by management to add, but beyond that, people would move on.

Removing the Internet as a whole at this stage would be basically impossible without halting pretty much every economic force on the planet, I think. The Internet acts as the backbone of pretty much everything related to monetary transactions or logistics in general.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 points 39 minutes ago

Yep, and after IOT stuff even some people homes would have plenty of problems

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I would do just fine without AI like I did when we didn’t have the Internet.

I mean, I considered the internet a godsend for a whole host of reasons and have been much better off with it than without it. Auto-Nav alone has saved me more hours utterly lost in my car than I care to think about.

But i would manage either way.

Wouldn't really have a choice.

But then that's the thing with AI. It's not "the internet". It's this superfluous annoying add-on that keeps getting forced into platforms I was perfectly happy to use without it.

I'm constantly "choosing" not to use it and then finding the damned thing branded onto the ass-end of whatever new application or environment I approach.

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

I'm not using any "forced on me" AI products, other than as a search engine aid, and I have better tools for that now anyway.

I do, absolutely use AI. I use local, self hosted small focused AI that run on old hardware I was just using to self host media and games anyway.

Want do my AI do? Lots of boring organizing, text/voice recognition, and script/simple coding for hobby projects and such, all offline. For online stuff there are private large models vailable, but those cost money and I'm cheap.

If I lost it all? Well it would just take me longer to do the boring stuff and have less time for fun stuff edit

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Anti-ai influencers using ai to complete their videos.

[–] Arsecroft@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 hour ago

people wouldnt just lie on the internet

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

In Photoshop, do I lose access to content-aware fill or just generative fill? Which selection tools remain?

[–] Jiggle_Physics@quokk.au 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Content aware fill isn't considered AI, and came out in 2010

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 5 points 54 minutes ago

If content-aware fill launched today, I bet they'd call it AI. Algorithms were variably called AI in 2010, depending on what we were talking about. But Adobe marketed content-aware fill as "magic" more than anything.