this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
257 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

87312 readers
4810 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Sounds like a big painting brush toward profit and Microsoft had the usual shit communication and execution.

More to the point though, this is the fundamental lesson many people who say they went to business school or are IT experts are apparently now learning; if it's not free and open source you can't depend on it staying that way and the last 10 years has been a sprint to enshittify. Why someone in IT would base their entire storage and archive practice on the assumption a paid service or grant will remain free through grants, when there is no money to go around to pivot the org is naive at best. I see these as the same type who will rail against inequality, fascism, etc. and then be on Twitter and Facebook. The nobler aspects of man cannot coexist alongside boundless greed and fascism. Move early or be prepared to "be shocked" when structural inevitability comes.

Libre Office and countless other options are out there, just waiting to be adopted. The cells have been made very comfortable by our jailers, but the keys are right there if you want freedom.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Generally hasn't been IT making these decisions. Same as cloud fundamentally just meaning offsite storage someone else owns. The PR push about how it somehow is not that was/is massive.

The momentum of cross functionality is also massive. There exist many programs and websites that do not accept non-microslop files.

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 11 points 1 day ago

Management is obsessed with the cloud and "serverless", because it's cheaper short-term, and they don't have to care about eventualities like hardware breaking.

Long-term, it would be far cheaper and way more secure to host locally, especially for data storage.

But we all know long-term thinking is something that management can't do. And of course, the PR doesn't help at all.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 22 hours ago

Yup, as a sr sysadmin I fought hard against moving our servers to the cloud. But the company never actually listened to IT about IT things.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 5 points 21 hours ago

I'll take The Noisy Decisions RMS and Linus Torvalds Made That Devastated Microsoft for all the marbles, Alex.

[–] zonico@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

Play stupid games win stupid prices

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›