Take your cameras down and maybe people don't want to destroy them. Good compromise, eh?
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
773 points (99.0% liked)
Technology
88659 readers
4178 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Safety from what Langley? What are the cameras keeping us safe from?
"Us" is the pedophiles running things, and "keeping us safe" means attacking their critics.
load more comments
(3 replies)
The comprise is for the flock ceo to commit suicide with a shotgun
No quarter for flock cameras no compromise with surveillance tech ceos
On the right, three House Republicans recently introduced a bill that would prohibit the federal government from purchasing automated surveillance systems that use facial recognition, biometric IDs, or license plate recognition, “including a Flock Safety camera.”
Really? Wow. Okay, when you lose Republicans (well, some Republicans), you KNOW you've gone too far. Damn.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I propose this compromise:
- No surveillance, at all.
- Flock rebrands to the shitty SaaS startup its name suggested it to be. I want to see the YouTube ads for "IrfanView, but paid and is a 500+MB chromium app"!
Yeah, no, the interpretations of the 4th amendment that led to these things being legal were clearly made in an era where they relied on the high cost of surveillance to minimize the amount there is. A reasonable modern day interpretation of the 4th should ban these
I AGREE! There IS common Ground between allowing the Epstein Class to SPY ON CHILDREN and the People who think CHILD RAPISTS Spying on Children is WRONG! Maybe just a COUPLE MILLION of Taxpayer Dollars to Spy on Children as a Treat?
-Centrists!
Langley needs to find a compromise between living and getting Luigi'd.
They're not even watching traffic though...
No, fuck off.
there's no compromise - take down ALL the fucking surveillance crap and take it down NOW.
I drove my company at the wall. Dearest wall, give me a compromise, pretty please?
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
That's how you know the reasons behind flock is nefarious, when they have to scale back what they're doing because of how blatantly obvious the overreach and invasion of privacy.
load more comments
(1 replies)
You have both by not having you around, asshole.
Die, Flock. The company would not be missed.
the compromise could be that they should take their own cameras down then do door to door petitions on who actually wants them.
I call for something else lol.
ok.
we'll continue ripping down your shitty products and you can just shut the fuck up.
see, isn't that a nice compromise?
The only compromise we want to see is the structural kind.
My suggestion for compromise would be to bring back tar and feathering
load more comments
(1 replies)
Not an inch ! Not a mm!
Get rid of them.