Programmer Humor

I'd be game for that. I hate the fact that photos of me exist in this world.

I suppose they weren't worth a 1000 words after all

This reminds me of IPoAC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers

Trying to find it funny, but in 2026 it's way too close to the bone and just makes me sad.

brilliant satire that critiques all of magazine journalism.

i love going to [insert publication here] and reading another article about 'so and so is ready for their next chapter in life.' the so and so always an uninteresting, overly wealthy fuckwit that hasn't accomplished anything other than going to college and having a wealthy parent.

Amateur. I can compress entire seasons of a TV series to a few bytes. All I have to do is type its title in Netflix and then BAM, gigabytes of video come out.

This is so sad, Chat GPT generate me an email responding to this article

The sad thing is that this has been possible for decades using convolutional autoencoders, but with LLMs we forgot that AI architectures other than transformers still exist.

Lossless -> lossy -> mindless.

It's humorous, but last I checked, the best general-purpose compressors with the highest levels of compression---even lossless, which is probably not what most people think of when they think of neural nets---are neural net based.

Neural net-based compressors are computationally expensive, which is why we don't normally use them for most day-to-day tasks, but they really can produce really small outputs.

I'm going to take the text of the US Constitution and stick it in a text file.

$ wget https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/5/pg5.txt
$ stat -c %s pg5.txt 
48326

Okay, so 48326 bytes.

Let's do lzo. You'd expect a limited amount of compression

LZO is "fast" compression, usually only used where compression speed is really important, like where you want to be compressing stuff that's going to be decompressed once and your bottleneck is throughput to disk:

$ lzop <pg5.txt >pg5.txt.lzo 
$ stat -c %s pg5.txt.lzo
24843

Okay, how about gzip? That's Deflate, an older, but pretty-widely-used general-purpose compression algorithm.

$ gzip <pg5.txt >pg5.txt.gz
$ stat -c %s pg5.txt.gz
16660

Okay, what about LZMA? That's a newer, more-CPU-intensive thing that's probably a good general-purpose choice that'll generally give better compression ratios. It's the kind of thing that I'd probably use in a lot of cases. (Personally, these days, I tend to use pixz, which provides both indexed access for tarballs and parallel compression and decompression, which is important for modern processors.)

$ xz <pg5.txt >pg5.txt.xz
$ stat -c %s pg5.txt.xz 
15488

Okay, now PAQ, a neural-net-based compressor:

$ zpaq a pg5.txt.zpaq a pg5.txt -method 5
$ stat -c %s pg5.txt.zpaq 
13063

It's basically just tricking the AI model to be your cloud storage provider.

Lmfao "tears of joy"

I've read that the Trump administration is hiring him to archive all of the Epstein files using that format.

Could have just stored those in PiFS https://github.com/philipl/pifs

On a similar note, I saw a story a bit back of someone saving input tokens by feeding the bot an image of a wall of text rather than the text itself and having it read the image via OCR.

Satire and reality are too hard too distinguish these days.

a typical jpeg of 20 Mb

Uh what. Literally should be the highest fucking possible quality from a $10K camera if it's that big. My raw images aren't even that big usually.

This is not funny, you don't understand how long and how many nights i spend overengineering compression pipelines for family photos and videos...

git-llmfs for JPEG, I kind of wish this was real just to laugh at users

Here is another one, no compression:

• read image
• send a prompt "regenerate image, here is pixel-by-pixel description"
• enjoy the result

(sarcasm)

New Math and vibe coding. Am I right? (insert canned laughter here).

He discovered alt text.