this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
384 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

88014 readers
3805 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Good riddance

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’ve paid for a few to see if it helps - It does and I feel like it was worth it up until 2 years ago when they changed how matching works. But you know what doesn’t work, people telling the truth on their profile. So great, I had better matches or in my case on bumble, better choice for matches based on who liked me. But damn if Jeni from the town next door loved “hiking” when really she just loved watching tv and one day wanted to “be more active”. She also told me she wanted to move to Spain one day… guess who also wanted to move to Europe ( Spain, wherever) - me! But I got the job and she’s pulling the “well not yet!!!” and in the end just wanted to visit and knew I have money to do this. P.s. I live in Spain now.

Each profile is a crafted (and truth bending) aspect of your life for others to review and I hate how it doesn’t capture the truth of who you really are in person. I went in being honest and found women who liked the same, but yet they were never really who they were on the app. I found my best matches when I wasn’t truthful or bent the truth a tad but yet I never stayed together long.

Best girlfriend so far, met her organically on the beach because my dog went over to say hi by licking her face. She’s a bit over the top, has tattoos everywhere including a funny phrase on her ass, but she’s the most compatible woman I’ve met so far.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is the phrase

Live, Laugh, Love

Written in comic sans

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Nah.. Papyrus

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So uh…this funny phrase tatoo…pics or it ain't real, internet rules 😂🤣.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 18 points 1 day ago

in essence its just to get men to keep swiping, and become the "product/data" to be sold. thats why its dying.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They were a silly concept to begin with. If they worked well, they'd kill their own business model. To stay economically viable they therefore have to use all kinds of tricks and produce mixed-at-best results, and cognitive manipulation to keep their user base entertained. Glad to see them finally collapse

That's BS, the population is literally aging into a new market evey year, but they want to nickel and dime to the point of exploitation their existing base ruining the reputation of the entire industry in the process.

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think, it's a myth that matchmaking has to be bad to survive. We see that in gaming all the time. The problem is just that physical world matchmaking is optimized to get recurrent customers instead of finding good matches. And that inevitably tanks the reputation. The first dating platform with good matchmaking will be the last one standing because it will suck the competition dry.
There is a market for good matchmaking. It's just not as big as the imagined market for bad matchmaking (which we see now isn't actually that big once people realize that the service sucks).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tweet@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or arguably it's the issue with running then as an unregulated business to begin with. It'd almost be better if it was just run as a public/non-profit database service: here's an anonymised, clinical, filterable list of other people who are looking for a relationship, and a safe way to connect with them. Like all other online services it'd be killed off by bots, trolls, and creeps, but still... If it's in the public's general interest for people to be in relationships?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Let me filter the bots, trolls, and creeps myself. I don't need a rent-seeking middleman for that.

(My wife's pickup line was trolling the shower curtains in my photo)

I never really believed that montra of if they were successful they lose a customer. I met my wife on a dating site over 13 years ago and told everyone I knew about it and how good it was. Many of the people that I told tried the site. It's a great way to spread your business if anything then through natural word of.mouth you actually kinda weed out people who are looking for the wrong things. Unfortunately the one I used ok cupid was bought by the big conglomerate and they change it so it was just like all the others. The other place I see it working is if governments offered the service because they want people to be matched up. I get people might not trust the government to match them up but why would you trust a company to do it then.

[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dying. They been dead. Tinder is nothing but catfish, Asian dudes pretending to be females, instagram wanna be models and actual sex workers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 221 points 2 days ago (3 children)

All of them being opened by a single money grubbing company, which has enshitified them to an accounting degree has not helped

[–] BeelzebubEiNukuKoskaan@piefed.social 50 points 2 days ago (6 children)

accounting

squints eyes not sure if typo or not

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 99 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Monopoly fucks up the entire market, news at 11."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anzo@programming.dev 126 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Are they? All my friends in their 30s have more than one app. Or had it, when they were single.

What has really been dying for quite some time is "third spaces". That's what we need to get back really, beyond dating. Just plain socializing and enjoying togetherness.

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What they mean is that dating apps have been enshitified to the point that most of them no longer function.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

From my own experience: dating apps all suck. Everything is staged, way too focused on visuals instead of inner values, etc. People get so lost in their and other peoples' appearance. Furthermore, the profit incentive makes the platform milk desperate users. Don't ever pay for otherwise free apps. They use you. Give you hope just as your subscription runs out, etc.

What I can personally recommend: dating subreddits like r4r. Reddit, I know, but the community on Lemmy is too small. You can meet people at your own speed and there is no profit incentive that ruins the platform for users. The algorithm treats all users more or less fairly, too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] darthsundhaft@piefed.social 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dating apps never really served their purpose. They killed themselves.

[–] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

Disagreed. OkCupid worked until Match Group destroyed it.

"Destruction of OkCupid as an attack against its liberal-skewed user base"
https://lemmy.world/post/24108120

[–] antianarchist@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 day ago (18 children)

I am currently developing one and what I can see is the following:

  • people get treated like cash cows. It is almost not possible to successfully date without spending money
  • people are burned out. The low quality swiping, matching, just to get ghosted, is hurting the motivation.
  • people have other problems nowadays. COVID reshaped us completely. We don’t want to spend 2h a day on a dating app. 2h a week max and then they want to continue in real life.

Those are pain points introduced by big corpos (e.g. Match.com) and the fact, that they have launched their apps before COVID.

I have addressed those pain points.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›