this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
57 points (91.3% liked)

Technology

88072 readers
3428 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slowtrain33@lemmy.ml 1 points 43 minutes ago

Article is paywalled (account walled?) so I can’t read the whole thing because I’m not making an account to read one article.

But I think it’s reckless to dismiss all “AI doomsaying” as advertising / hype for AI companies. SOME of it is absolutely that. Some of it is real concern from experts that should not be ignored.

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

We passed the period of exponential LLM growth as of mid-2025 and now the gains are just incremental, which has given open models a chance to rapidly close the gap. Now the narrative is that the “dangerous” open LLMs need to get kneecapped while the “safer” closed LLMs continue with a healthy lead.

[–] reev@sh.itjust.works 2 points 24 minutes ago

There's no feasible way to do that when the open models are in an entirely different jurisdiction, fortunately enough

[–] lmcj@mathstodon.xyz 6 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

@return2ozma it would be so nice if they just advertised these things as tools, not wolrd ending devices...

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 3 points 3 hours ago

But, they would have to be realistic about the cost efficiencies. If companies had to pay the actual cost of these tools, they’d probably just hire another person instead.

[–] shads@leminal.space 5 points 5 hours ago

Oh when I see AI shilling I see them as tools.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

Well, only govts can realistically pay for the shit they're trying to sell, so gotta make the appropriate sales pitch