this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
13 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43572 readers
336 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] halm@leminal.space 10 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

clean tech

nuclear fuel

Sorry, I know there are various perspectives on how "clean" nuclear power is, but those two just don't rhyme in my mind. Especially not to the tune of "let's extract uranium from sea water".

[–] lath@piefed.social 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The reason it's clean is because in case of failure it will clean out the human population on a larger scale, thus saving the planet.

lol

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 1 points 37 minutes ago

Not that I disagree with OP's point, hasn't fossil fuels working as intended "cleaned up" more of the human population than all the nuclear powerplant failures?

[–] NightFantom@slrpnk.net 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The right time for nuclear power was decades ago, which could have offset our current carbon issues by a lot, but alas. Now is the time for solar+wind+batteries, it's already cheaper in most places and a lot less dangerous if something goes wrong.

[–] halm@leminal.space 4 points 3 hours ago

Agreed, I just wanted to preempt any "well akshually, nuclear power is perfectly clean" discussions.

The "if something goes wrong" is certainly part of my reservations. There's been more than one example of that happening in my lifetime, and one was too many.

Another concern is that we have no better idea to dispose of the nuclear waste than burying it really deep. That sounds like a good recipe to have it come back and bite future generations in the ass.

So yeah, clean and sustainable would mean solar/hydro/wind energy in my mind.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Don't let the nuclear cult hear such blasphemic facts.

[–] halm@leminal.space 1 points 3 hours ago

~~cult~~ investors

There, fixed that for you 🙂