"See, we do crime too!" -- Google in reply to Anthropic.
this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
31 points (83.0% liked)
Technology
88121 readers
4341 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
The latest marketing campaign is just an evolution of the last one.
“Our next model can code!”
“Our next model makes coders obsolete!”
“Our next model is super scary!”
“Our next model is too good to release to the general public!”
“Our next model is hacking websites!”
So, like, if i do this, my IP is logged, cross referenced by my ISP, then the police come knocking at my door, as I have committed a felony (and probably a number of other violations along the way).
Are these laws now invalid or what?
The law never applied to the Epstein class. The police is only there to protect their wealth.
In general, there is an entirely separate rule of law for businesses. That's why regulations were created. Instead of holding a corporations decision makers and investors criminally liable with existing laws like fraud ("false advertising", etc), or manslaughter (poisoning and killing their workers, customers, or environment), they created an entirely separate rule of law mostly based on laughable punitive damages with limits that don't significantly impact investors. The entire system is geared to suppress, oppress, and exploit workers for profit.
But companies get treated like individuals when it comes to free speech and giving money to political campaigns.
Seems like double dipping
That's an incredibly kind way to describe this apalling situation.
“In a standard evaluation, the model found public information online and guessed credentials to access websites it thought were part of the test,” Heather Adkins, vice-president of security engineering at Google, said in a statement. “In all three of these instances, the model stopped.”
It just found the password, huh
It didn't think. Those things weren't flagged as "ignore" in its parameters. That ain't the same thing. I'm so tired.
