this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
15 points (89.5% liked)

Selfhosted

62211 readers
1329 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hi. i'm looking for an extremely simple selfhosted photo gallery software. i have photos from my laptop, a camera, and my phone. they are all rsync'ed onto my server. so on the server I have ~/Pictures/Laptop ~/Pictures/Camera ~/Pictures/Phone filled with JPEG/PNG/HEICs and no subdirectories.

i want to view photos from all three directories on a single timeline/feed, from the web (and if possible, via a mobile app). currently I VNC onto the server to run XnView and check each directory and this is a terrible user experience especially on a phone.

i don't want to run a separate database or anything complex, so things like Immich or Photoprism are not an option. would be nice to be able to assign a tag to some images ("work", "computer", ...) but it's not a necessity. and i don't need the ability to edit/remove images from the gallery.

i've considered rolling my own solution but thought there might be something already available.

thanks!

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 5 points 50 minutes ago

I’ve been using Immich for a couple of years now, and I really like. Nextcloud is good, too.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 3 minutes ago

PiGallery/PiGallery2 , Photoview, HomeGallery, lychee, or thumbsup might be up your alley.

Personally I use Immich and ImmichFrame.

[–] yodeljunkmanenvy@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I have a use case where I use Next Explorer to share some directories with photos in them for others to see online. Clean, simple UI and no database, it just indexes your directories. PWA works well on phones.

It does run on docker though (like many, many foss apps). 🤷

2NBhLdHL5B6xJS0.png

[–] worldclasspun@programming.dev 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Here to suggest piwigo. Use it with docker, zero hassle but I think it does depend on a database, so it might be too heavy for your use case. Supports tags & galleries.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Immich works really well. Don’t fear the database. Docker makes it all super easy too.

Alternatively, Plex manages photos ok-ish.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (4 children)

I really don't want another complex service i have to manage. ideally i want something that's a simple python/perl/php script or something like that.

forgot to mention in OP but I run freebsd on my server and it's possible to run docker(podman) with linux emulation if it's very necessary, but i prefer not to use it

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Immich isn't complex, and I don't think it requires a separate database.

Edit: just checked and technically it does, but if you use the docker compose then it deploys it automatically and you don't have to think about it at all.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 hours ago

I hear you, I went through the same journey. After getting Immich set up, I haven’t had to do a single thing to it. There are scripts that can turn your folders into Immich albums, so I just set up the docker containers, ran the script, and watched as everything was created for me without more labor on my part.

I hope somebody else has the solution you’re looking for, but if you don’t find it, I really think you should give it a whirl because it turned out to be way easier than I expected it to be.

You're likely not going to find something so simple and lightweight. Immich has some setup, but if you want a good gallery that's the way to go. Don't be afraid of the learning.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

It does nothing but serve photo. Background tasks are minimal and many of them only run once on new photos.

[–] K3can@lemmy.radio 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago

this might actually work. thanks!

I've been using PiGallery2 for this https://github.com/bpatrik/pigallery2

But I do deploy via docker.

[–] linuxguy@piefed.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

It looks like every reply in this is a near miss so I'll add another one to the pile: I've been working on a hosted immich platform for people who want privacy from big tech and don't want to / can't self host it at https://photos.minpin.me/

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I have no experience with it, but my questions along a similar vein point to DigiKam.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago

i have used DigiKam in the past, it's more of an alternative to XnView not a selfhosted gallery.. it doesn't even support mobile phones or web