this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
290 points (95.6% liked)

Fuck AI

8481 readers
936 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 178 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

What he means is:

"You should keep buying our expensive product as fast as possible, no matter what anyone else says!"

[–] deeprlyeh@lemmus.org 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

If AI wins or doesn’t, he will still make all the money. No, reason to not trust him.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He willl make less money if AI slows down, so his opinion can't be trusted.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 103 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"buy my shit buy it buy it buy it"

“The only way for the bubble not to burst is for me to make it so much bigger.”

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@lemmy.ca 66 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

While I do see AI usage as a danger, I don't see an AI gaining super intelligence within 3 years and killing everyone.

The pollution from the data centers is the bigger threat as is the cognitive decline of the users.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The problem isn't AI gaining intelligence, it's allowing AI to have agency and then it gets an potentially dangerous prompt that leads it to hack into, just for the sake of being funny, a bunch of places to delete the entire stock market. As funny as it would be it would lead to a complete economic collapse. I'd actually feel safer if it did have actual intelligence. We're talking about a technology where if you have broken unit tests (software term meaning a certain set of tests the code has to pass to be considered functional) and you tell AI to "fix the unit tests" there's a non-zero chance of it just deleting the tests and saying it's fixed.

AI is dangerous not in the way movies present it where it gains sentience and wipes us out. It's dangerous in the opposite way where it doesn't have intelligence and wipes us out because it doesn't understand it's doing something that's going to kill us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The reason AI is a danger is because it's dumb.

They're literally giving it bombs and complete autonomy in drones already

What happens when you give a very unintelligent baby a chambered pistol with the safety off? Now do that with tens of thousands of babies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 55 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

TBF, he's right. AI won't destroy the world. Humans using AI will.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago

And especially humans peddling AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rookeh@startrek.website 42 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Something tells me that he might not be completely objective...

[–] RustySharp@programming.dev 16 points 3 weeks ago

Leopards say there's 0% chance they would eat everyone's faces by 2030. Advocates accelerating leopard breeding programs, despite local leopard breeder warnings.

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Man selling shovels in a gold rush says there's gold out there, and it is in no way uranium that will give you cancer if you fill your pockets with it. Just keep buying shovels.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

No, the gold rush isn't over, says shovel salesman.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 3 weeks ago

its the jackets, he wants it solid gold.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] houndeyes@toast.ooo 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We should go as fast as we can

Stockton Rush vibes.

[–] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago

I, for one, would appreciate the demise of another billionaire

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 3 weeks ago

You’re so close to the gold bro, just buy a couple more shovels.

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I agree with him purely because an LLM is not intelligent, any time you hear about it doing something like hacking on its own it was a marketing stunt

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I didn't read this as AI sentients but as AI killing the world through its irresponsible use of resources like water and electricity.

Basically, he's saying "I need to get as rich as possible so that I can have enough money to survive the water wars."

[–] Palerider@feddit.uk 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Problem with that kind of thinking is that once society has gone down the pan, money is worthless...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

My son in law doesn't believe that. You can tell he is down the rabbit hole on it. Its pretty clear this is all happening to create the lie that these algorithmic word salads have volition.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Shockingly the CEO of the company that would benefit from regulatory capture of AI says that, and the CEO of the company that would suffer from regulatory capture of AI says this. What a shock...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 13 points 3 weeks ago

The time to trust what anyone with a profit motive says is long over.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"Man who has funded scam says scam must continue unabated despite warnings"

Its almost like nvidia has so much imaginary valuation tied up in the whole AI bullshit that they know when it crashes, it could very likely take nvidia with it.

and I, personally, think it will be a good day for nvidia to die as a company. They've been at the forefront of making shit worse for customers for well over a decade now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Shovel and casket maker says there is nothing to worry about. Now help me lift this dead body. Use your legs.

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

lol the guys entire business model is selling the components that make this bullshit spin. Of course he would say that. His opinion isn’t worth shit.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Just another big talking fool, saying unknown things with confidence.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

He personally makes more money this way, so this is not a surprise.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a crack in the AI-bros alliance.

On one side, AI companies running out of cash for their expansion race and looking for excuses to pause everything but more importantly everyone else with them.

On the other side, the only corp that actually sells something, invested shitload of money in the AI hype and needs making profit on hardware at an insane rates to recoup his investments otherwise he's toast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bw42@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Ah yes, the "Legitimate" Lord Neverwinter wants us all to stay and watch the games until the end. There will be a gift for each of us.

[–] SwooshBakery624@programming.dev 7 points 3 weeks ago

NVIDIA recently acquired HuggingFace for a huge sum. It makes perfect sense that Huang would say something like that.

[–] Spiregarden@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

His denial actually makes the warnings more credible. For a while I was worried why they'd all agree.

[–] crispbacon99@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago

Large language models have plateaued is something they won't admit plus they wanna do the regulations while the Israeli controlled us government is still in power

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I seriously doubt it as well. Chances AI destroys humanity within the next 3 years and 3 months should be close to zero. The conclusion, though! Why would we do that if it destroys us for example by 2034?!??

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 19 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

OpenAI/Anthropic want regulation to make sure they dominate the market and prevent any competition. Nvidia wants no regulation so they can sell as many GPUs as possible and keep driving the prices up. That's pretty much all there is to this supposed debate about the dangers of AI.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hawanja@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Just watched a majority report video, the gist was the A.I. companies want regulations to prevent other companies (like say from China) competing in the US, so they're spreading this b.s. alarmist drivel about how we're 6 months away from skynet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DonkeyStar@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Jensen Huang should be forced to wear a polo shirt whenever he does this shit. I genuinely think he’d stop.

[–] Cheebus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I just wanted to play fucking video games, not fund eugenics

Jensen, take your stupid fucking jacket, shove it up your ass

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Huang, Pictured here trying to suck his own dick, says 'Buy more of my product. I'll never get off until I destroy the world.'

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Wow, so good to have a guarantee of at least 4 years... 🙄

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

0% chance by 2030.

But a 100% chance by 2031.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›