this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
10 points (100.0% liked)

World News

41708 readers
77 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump regime is preparing sweeping sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC) in an attempt to destroy the world’s highest criminal court. The move is Donald Trump’s latest move to defend wanted Israeli war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu.

The sanctions would ban a majority of financial transactions with the court, isolating it from the US dollar and — if the global banking system capitulates as expected — from that too. Trump is expected to make a final decision during this week’s UN General Assembly gathering in New York City.

Trump has already abused US financial power to sanction the ICC president, judges and former chief prosecutor Karim Khan, as well as engineering Khan’s removal from his post, despite judges finding no evidence against him in sexual harassment allegations.

The US has previously said it would dismantle the ICC if it did not drop its charges against Netanyahu and other Israelis who have committed crimes against humanity.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orenj@leminal.space 1 points 2 hours ago

Golly gee, i wonder what would motivate someone to do that

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

So he wants to liberate the ICC from US influence at a time where other countries are withdrawing support for the US dollar? Cool! Then they won’t be puppets to the American imperialist agenda anymore.

They’ll keep doing what they’ve always done. Nothing.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

is it just me that can't unsee the vagina in his neck?

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.ca 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Attempting to dismantle the courtroom is not the choice an innocent person makes.

[–] DaveyRocket@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

To be fair, I’d like to dismantle a lot of the classist, racist justice system that so many experience, but I’m guilty of being poor so maybe you’re on to something…

[–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

The ICC is a joke, I welcome dismantling it, it is a selective justice organization and lacks enforcement of its findings. Neither Israel nor the United States is a party to the Rome Statute, meaning the ICC holds no direct jurisdiction over them. The arrest warrant for Netanyahu was completely symbolic. ICC has and always intended to be a tool of neocolonial oppression in the hands of imperialists.

[–] dx1@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

This take doesn't make much sense in light of the facts. Why issue a warrant against Netanyahu instead of capitulating to the Zionist narrative? Why create a legal quagmire in member states? Also, while it doesn't have "direct jurisdiction" over non-members, i.e., the member states themselves aren't bound to enforce its decisions, the member states do have obligations against members of non-member state who are indicted. That's the whole thing. Palestine is a signatory, so they can issue a warrant against Netanyahu for his crimes there. The move to dismantle a court obviously drags down the legitimacy of a state, as well, so why would they fight so hard against a purely symbolic decision.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Neither Israel nor the United States is a party to the Rome Statute, meaning the ICC holds no direct jurisdiction over them.

most of the countries in europe are party to the rome statute, so they are under its jurisdiction, but the way they've bent over backwards to find loopholes that guarantee that netanyahu won't be arrested prove that the icc's existence is meaningless.

[–] Trioxin@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 12 hours ago

Idk, it must mean something if the empire is throwing such a fit over even a symbolic gesture from them...

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

If it was so powerless, why is the orange rapist so upset?

[–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago

Because he is a toddler who cries about everything, even the court's symbolic authority.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 14 hours ago

CHILD rapist.

Actually, Trump is a SERIAL child rapist.

But that wasn't just random children, that was a structured island by a billionaire literally for that purpose, so "serial child rapist" doesn't properly describe it. The praised rich haven't yet created a term for that because it's so outside of what has ever been punished.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I can't wait for the day when we turn him, Hegseth, and PeeWee Himmler Miller over to the ICC - after we're done with them.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 5 points 15 hours ago

the last time we tried to try fascists, we created things like operation paperclip to to protect them and we would be fools to assume that history won't repeat itself if we ever start trying anyone in the administration -- kissinger was a MUCH worse war criminal and nixon publicly admitted to pointlessly imprisoning and millions of americans for political gain and, yet, they both died rich and peacefully at home surrounded by people who loved him.