this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
1608 points (99.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

42208 readers
5099 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But seriously what kind of predatory policy is that in the first place?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 157 points 2 days ago (29 children)

Having worked in the industry, there's actually an explanation that is only half predatory.

Most of those addicted to gambling can't and won't shake it. They refuse to seek professional help, and the decision to quit only lasts the "temporary embarrassment" phase of losing all their money. Meaning: most gamblers who decide to quit (and we've got statistics on this), about 80-85% on average, is back to their favourite gambling service within 60 days.

At the company I worked at, the primary reasoning for having a cooldown period instead of instant deletion was the following:

  • the cooldown period can already be linked with our lockout service which blocks the person from using the service for X days, so if they REALLY wanted to, they could block themselves for the entire time (and it surprisingly is being offered as part of the cooldown period)
  • if there's a regulatory block (meaning you got formally diagnosed by a doctor, and that doctor, with your consent, reached out to the local regulatory body and requested a blacklist entry for you), the service is blocked either way
  • the users who do come back, don't want to lose their "stats" - their previous bets, wins, losses, etc. would all be gone with a new account. In fact, the number one complaint from returning users was that their data was gone.

Basically the idea is "if they're coming back anyway, we might as well make it easy for them".

Now the thing is, for all the regulations... Gambling services are unfortunately not responsible for the addiction they cause. In my opinion they should be, just as a doctor would be held responsible if they fed into a patient's painkiller addiction. And for all the regulatory crap... most people in gambling companies aren't interested in compliance that much. It's very much a "do it then say sorry and fix it in post" attitude from the leadership and higher management. So while the above might be the "official" explanation, I have zero doubt that the decision makers don't give a fuck and are specifically doing it to psychologically pressure people into coming back.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Basically the idea is "if they're coming back anyway, we might as well make it easy for them".

What exactly is the non-predatory half of that?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Basically the idea is "if they're coming back anyway, we might as well make it easy for them"."

Thats extremely predatory, you are leaving bait in a trap.

The responsible thing would be to delete and ban them since they have an addiction.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 72 points 2 days ago

Basically the idea is "if they're coming back anyway, we might as well make it easy for them".

That sadly sums it up pretty well.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 day ago

It's the wild West meets end stage capitalism out there.

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.nz 116 points 2 days ago

A gambling service has a predatory policy to make breaking an addiction as hard as possible. Yep that sounds about right

[–] solitaire404@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (8 children)

At least for us that are clever, can use tactics like this while we can.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Siethron@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This predatory nature is going into my thesis on how gacha gaming led to the downfall of online porn

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›