this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
119 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12540 readers
500 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] codydodd@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What is terrible is it will be hard to tell sometimes, publishers are awash with slop.

Its to the point if you can prove it was written before LLMs existed then the value of your work is suddenly much higher.

[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 1 points 1 hour ago

If the authors dont disclose to publishers they cant know too. For authors they get pressure to write faster because everyone is atleast AI assisted.

TBH i dont care if its AI written but the result of AI writing is sloppy. Lots of fluff and weird wording. Also sloppy research is likely as AI spits out facts and the authos dont have to look into the source anymore. Peer reviewing must become stronger and will be a quality sign for publishers in future.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 hours ago

As they should be. Same as them not having much of a chance of getting Copyright on AI stuff.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

AI turns everything to crap.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 40 minutes ago

Not true.

Some stuff was already crap and AI just smears it in lipstick.

The silly thing is that the rule that’s always been the rule in data processing hasn’t changed: GIGO, or garbage in, garbage out. AI tempts people who would otherwise provide quality work to skip the quality part for the sake of speed.

Proper use of AI doesn’t really speed anything up; it just changes the scale of how you can leverage the results. And people, being lazy, settle for “good enough” output slop generated from “good enough” inputs.

So in reality, AI throws a spotlight on how crappy many people’s work is.