this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
127 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

89408 readers
4874 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google announced Tuesday that early next year it would turn off artificial intelligence tools in its popular software for K-12 students, unless school administrators explicitly choose to make such tools available. Executives at the tech giant said they wanted to be responsive to educators and parents who have asked for more control in how children interact with A.I. But there is a catch: Schools that choose to restrict A.I. entirely will also lose access to Google search.

A.I. features are now a standard part of Google’s commercially available search engine. “Search and A.I. are deeply integrated,” said Chris Phillips, vice president for education at Google. If a school has banned A.I., he added, students “will not have access to search, and they’ll see a message from their school that indicates it’s not available.” Google is by far the dominant technology player in K-12 classrooms. Google’s suite of education apps — including Gmail, Docs and an assignment platform called Classroom — is ubiquitous. Google Chromebooks, low-cost laptops, are the most widely issued student devices in U.S. schools. And Google is synonymous with internet search, a crucial tool for students across the globe.

The company’s new strategy underscores Google’s powerful role in American education. If school leaders want continued student access to search within the company’s ecosystem, they will be forced to embrace Google’s A.I. In recent months, Google has been promoting its Gemini chatbot as a valuable educational tool, saying it can aid teachers in planning lessons and serve as a personalized tutor for students. A new student version of Gemini, Guided Learning, is supposed to make it harder for students to use A.I. to cheat.

“We’re evolving our approach,” said Mr. Phillips. He promised tools that would “support the productive struggle” of learning and tamp down on students turning to A.I. for easy answers. In August, Google turned on A.I. features as the default option inside its Classroom app for K-12 schools that had allowed students separate access to the company’s Gemini chatbot. The move upset some school leaders, who felt schools should be able to decide how and when students used Google’s A.I.

Google’s August change will now be reversed.

A parent movement has been pushing back against the use of A.I. in schools, and against screen time more generally. While A.I. chatbots can be useful tools for research and coding, they can also easily be used to cheat on school assignments and can provide false information. Research shows chatbots can also hinder critical thinking and ensnare adolescents in emotional dependency.

Last week, New York State passed a chatbot safety law that would prohibit companies from providing a variety of A.I. features for minors. And in September, the nation’s two largest school districts, in New York City and Los Angeles — both Google clients — broadly restricted student access to generative artificial intelligence on school devices. Officials in the Los Angeles Unified School District said at the time that they were hoping students would be able to conduct Google searches with A.I. overviews turned off. The overviews are A.I.-generated summaries that appear at the top of searches. They can dissuade students from seeking out multiple sources of information. On Monday, Google executives said that for districts that choose to allow A.I., there will be two options for search inside school-issued accounts, beginning in early 2027. One option will be search with A.I. overviews and A.I. chats turned on, similar to the current consumer experience. The other will be search using Guided Learning, the student version of Google’s Gemini chatbot.

Guided Learning is intended to guide students through a topic step-by-step without providing them with answers that could short-circuit learning. It is supposed to offer an experience modeled on one-to-one tutoring.

The consumer version of Guided Learning is already available within Gemini, and can enable cheating. In a reporter’s test, it produced a detailed essay in response to an Advanced Placement history prompt.

There are greater restrictions in the school version that is currently being piloted, according to Brit Mennuti, product lead for Google Classroom. She said teachers would be able to review students’ chatbot transcripts, among other capabilities.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 1 points 11 minutes ago

Your terms are acceptable.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 62 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 27 points 1 hour ago (4 children)

Member when software companies offered ultra cheap student licenses because they recognized the long term value of a student learning and getting accustomed to their program? I member.

This seems very, very shortsighted.

[–] anewfox@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

github had (has?) free pro accounts for students back when github didn't offer private repos for free. if you forgot to cancel your student account when you graduated, github would simply hold your private repos hostage unless you paid for them. no option given to simply make them public repos. i would have lost mountains of my work had they not fucked up and unlocked my repos for a couple hours, which allowed me to clone everything i didn't have locally and migrate to gitlab.

so basically, sometimes those student offers build in scam tactics.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 12 points 1 hour ago

Exactly this! Imagine a whole generation associating search with DDG or Kagi? That would really move the needle in the future regarding tech adoption to alternative platforms

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 1 points 38 minutes ago

Student discounted software started when most of the corporate world was still using typewriters and paper. Students learned the new-fangled software and carried into their new jobs.

Today, those same businesses rely on Microsoft Office and Google search, and those monopolies are obviously going to leverage their monopolies to force AI, Teams, or whatever other Next Big Thing onto unwilling schools.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

But Google needs the return on AI right now! Those kids are just products that produced data to be sold.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 29 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Oh shucks..

🦆🦆▶️

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 13 points 1 hour ago (2 children)
[–] krathalan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Is thos some sort of cheat code? If I press these at the Google homepage does a secret menu come up?

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 6 points 1 hour ago

"get your ducks in a row"

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Took me a couple of blinks until I got those emoji. 😄

[–] Vorrash@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago

Don’t threaten me with a good time!

[–] o8bepbua9@lemmy.world 31 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure it's a tactic to make the schools allow AI, but I hope they can resist. Google does not need a stranglehold on every person in every market. Google search has gotten worse anyway, so even duck duck go would be fine. Maybe even use this as an opportunity to teach kids about data privacy.

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 6 points 1 hour ago

Might also be an attempt to keep their Search numbers up. I saw an article recently that AI is hurting Google Search because of the lack of click through due to AI summaries.

By packaging them together they get to boost both options through a semi-captive audience.

[–] moonshadow@sh.itjust.works 1 points 27 minutes ago

This is known as "malicious compliance", here's hoping it backfires

[–] cy@fedicy.us.to 9 points 1 hour ago

Oh nooo they won't have access to Google Search. How terrrrible. What ever will they doooo

[–] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Sure, Google is evil, etc. But the school admin can default omnibar search to another search engine. Like noai.duckduckgo. com.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 15 points 2 hours ago

Sounds like a win win. They don't have to use ai if they choose not to, and they also get incentivized to explore switching to other search engines

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

Those chromebooks are a smoking deal aren't they school systems, we told you in countless meetings, emails, and snail mail this was a bad idea.

[–] usernameunnecessary@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 hour ago

In case you still had doubts that google is evil

[–] AliOski@feddit.nl 1 points 47 minutes ago

Time to use DuckDuckGo or Startpage

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Yes, yes. Let Google keep digging its own grave. 🪏

[–] rounding_error@lemmy.today 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Schools should pay for Kagi

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

You okay with increasing school budgets? That seem to be a hard sell for America, for instance.

[–] rounding_error@lemmy.today 12 points 2 hours ago

Yes, I am. I think students should get free breakfast and lunch too.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I'm an American and literally just voted yes to increase my taxes to improve local schools. Sure there's red chunks who don't understand but the country is not this monoculture people keep making it out to be

[–] giant_smeeg@feddit.uk 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Kagi is free for Libraries, maybe schools could cut a nice deal too!

[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] giant_smeeg@feddit.uk 3 points 1 hour ago

https://kagi.com/libraries

Looks like they can tailor to schools/universities, unsure on the costs of course though.
https://form.kagi.com/education

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Isn’t this the logic that lead to Chromebooks and the illiteracy crisis?

Sure, take this heavily discounted tech for your digital native kids. Just make sure they use only our software, never learn what files are, never have access to the terminal where they might customize their system, and we have all their data.

I was taught if something seems too good to be true it isn’t, and also there’s no such thing as a free lunch.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Might be nice for a certain age group to make them evaluate multiple search engines as a class project. ("If it provided a summary, did it say what its sources were?" "When you checked the sources, did they actually say what the summary said they said?" "How many actual results did it return for these searches?" "How many of the results on the first page were useful?" etc.) Improved media literacy in general, and they all learn that more than one search engine exists.

[–] moonshadow@sh.itjust.works 1 points 28 minutes ago

Love this! Could have the graduating class determine what the incoming kids will start out with, give their decisions a little impact :)