this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
119 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

89443 readers
4335 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 hour ago

Not one metric has ever once failed to be weaponized by management. The main decision we make at my company to determine what metrics are even allowed to be used is "are we willing to give any random manager the ability to fire someone from our own personal staff because of this reason."

This is the type of news that makes me smile. Yes. I would love for these hack AI regurgitating "consultants" LARPing as CEO's on LinkedIn to ruin their businesses because they don't understand basic social psychology. I'd love for my competitors to blindly allow their management to engage with this practice. I'm sick of these mouthbreathers having the funds to engage with my company and wasting my management staff's time trying to sell them on frivolous bullshit. Become insolvent and go bag fries FFS.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

Pretty sure you can‘t do that in the EU. Your boss is not even allowed to give AI details about you or consult it about you. The thought that Anthropic wants Claude to become your supervisor is deranged and dystopian.

[–] medem@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 hour ago

Could we like...stop pretending that this wasn't the plan all along?

The AS cartel isn't investing what are already trillions of dollars in that technology because they want humanity to prosper, or because they hope commoners will pay a miserly monthly subscription. They are doing it because they know that middle managers will use it to get rid of you. If that's not possible or feasible, then at least squeeze you out. That requires invasive monitoring. I mean, obviously, right ?

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 42 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Anthropic says Smart Reports shouldn't be used to evaluate employees, then lets management attach names to their Claude sessions. Apparently workplace surveillance becomes ethical if you put a disclaimer on it. The real innovation here is outsourcing micromanagement to the machine.

[–] o8bepbua9@lemmy.world 15 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

AI can make decisions and micromanage. What's stopping the higher ups from replacing lower management now?

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 44 minutes ago

As I understand it this exact application of AI is currently prohibited by the EU.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Kissassery, mostly. Why have one AI inflate your ego when you can have twelve department heads and one AI stroke your ego?

[–] Blibittyblah@futurology.today 9 points 2 hours ago

Hey Claude, go on the Internet and spread misinformation about my boss so that they get fired and I can take their job.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Good. Fuck Claude. Fuck any company that uses it. I hope they eat themselves alive from the inside out. Stop working for companies that do this.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago

Reasonable. I hate eating and paying rent.

[–] MakingWork@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Micromanagement to a whole new level.

Is it really any different than companies having full access to your email, teams chats, and other correspondence tools provided by the company?

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The only thing protecting us before was "who has the time to analyze all the data we gather about you?".

Without analysis how could they tell that you consistency take an extra 1.45 minutes to clock back in from lunch when you eat Taco Bell. Schedule a colon cancer screening, while also increasing your health insurance premium along with your estimated new risk level due to your sub optimal life choices? This is all needed to insure you last meat bags with jobs perform to shareholder expectations.

Well guess what LLMs are really good at?

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

This was already possible with everything on enterprise plans anyway, this is just streamlining piping the data back in for Claude to analyze. Sensationalist headline

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

There's a pile of products that already monitor LLM use, prompts, data sent, etc. There's a whole branch of cyber called AISPM tnat deals with it.

[–] baldur@normals.me 1 points 3 hours ago

This is going to be chaotic!