this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
368 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

74407 readers
2272 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump tweet:

It is my Great Honor to report that the United States of America now fully owns and controls 10% of INTEL, a Great American Company that has an even more incredible future. I negotiated this Deal with Lip-Bu Tan, the Highly Respected Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The United States paid nothing for these Shares, and the Shares are now valued at approximately $11 Billion Dollars. This is a great Deal for America and, also, a great Deal for INTEL. Building leading edge Semiconductors and Chips, which is what INTEL does, is fundamental to the future of our Nation. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! Thank you for your attention to this matter.

(page 2) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 28 points 20 hours ago

Somehow this is okay but bailing out GM was a problem.

[–] randompasta@lemmy.today 198 points 1 day ago (9 children)

He just nationalized Intel. That's what conservatives are afraid of far left governments doing.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 151 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Further, he killed all trust in Intel. Now, no one will believe that there are no government back doors into everything they make.

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 4 points 17 hours ago

Intel is a us corporate they do as the US spooks tell them to do.

That's national security laws.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For real, this just further cemented me not wanting to buy any new Intel devices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frazw@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Intel never deserved trust. They rigged the game by cheating on benchmark tests and deserve the karma they are currently enjoying.

I guess the average consumer would not be very aware of Intel being so shitty, but now everyone has a reason to be wary of them.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Their biggest problem is that people don't want to buy their stuff because it's bad, they can worry about their backdoory image later

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 21 points 1 day ago

Honestly this. Their cpus melting down over the past couple years and their refusal to even acknowledge it hurt their image more than any potential backdoor could.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moody@lemmings.world 15 points 1 day ago

"Nationalized" with a heavy dose of quote marks. The government now owns about 10% of Intel in non-voting shares. It's basically meaningless.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup. They also rewrote national broadband funding criteria so starlink would win most of the state contracts for funding. If the states are stupid enough to take it, the Elon Musk will own their citizens internet. Colorado just announced Starlink won half of all the contracts and Amazon the other half(I didn't even know Amazon provided Internet holy terrifying):

You may experience difficulty connecting to some web domains and your homepage has been preselected for you. Your monthly history will be reviewed and unpatriotic web usage will result in detainment or deportation.

Congratulations on your Freedom!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Those worthless cunt traitors never acted in good faith. FFS, they willingly elected a child rapist.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 day ago

Lol at all the conservatives screeching about "socialism" and "communism" and how they will be the downfall of our country, then slurping up Trump nationalizing part of Intel 🤣

They don't believe in anything, just brain dead simpleton cultists who would happily stick their tongue into a rat trap if Trump told them to do it.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 85 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could you imagine how many times the word "socialism" would be blasted on Fox News if Biden did this?

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 104 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I negotiated this Deal with Lip-Bu Tan, the Highly Respected Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

That i tried to get fired less than two weeks ago.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Teal@piefed.zip 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A ten percent stake in the company and suddenly those concerning Chinese ties Trump mentioned aren’t a thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 day ago

Literallt extortion.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The way This Guy capitalizes Random Words drives me INSANE.

If you wanna be president of the United States, you should at least learn the language.

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 12 points 22 hours ago

Also "Thank you for your attention to this matter." has such "Facebook local area group" energy, like a Boomer shouting into the void about teenagers always loitering at the bus stop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The United States will not seek direct representation on Intel's board

If they want change, they don't to vote on the board. They can just pass laws in Intel's favour.

Taxpayers are now all Intel shareholders. I can't understand what benefit this provides them.

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 4 points 17 hours ago

Better than giving away billions of dollars no string attached

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago

Release the Trump/Epstein files

[–] MrSmith@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Since Wall Street, never really was.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're more right than you may know.

An actual city wall existed on the street from 1653 to 1699. During the 18th century, the location served as a slave market and securities trading site, and from 1703 onward

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago

No cliffhanger please.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Functionally, there's no such thing. In a system that gives the most power to the company that makes the most money, that company will seek to maximize its profits. Part of maximizing profits is eliminating competition. So in a "free" market, the most successful will subvert the freedom of their competition thus eliminating the freedom in the market.

Self-correction in a market is an illusion crafted people either desperate to salvage a broken system, or those who seek to exploit them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago
[–] byte_0verflow@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

Right when I was thinking of buying an intel cpu and gpu to support the company and do my little part in helping increase competition in the cpu and gpu sector. Guess I will stick with amd this time around.

Now do that with Exxon Mobil, Chevron and ConocoPhillips

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Therobohour@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Say goodbye to 10% of your tax dollars

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How is it a great deal for Intel?

[–] _wizard@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Also interested in seeing. I've had weekly reoccurring purchases of Intel since their bottom dropped. My investment probably shit the bed.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

buying stock with the people's money just in time for a recession

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As far as government bail outs go, I think taking a portion of the company in exchange is an excellent idea. THIS orange asshole is doing it for all the wrong reasons, and will VERY likely fuck up literally everything about it, but the idea is sound.

I wonder what things would look like today if the government had taken some portion of control over all the auto manufacturers, airlines, banks, etc it has bailed out over the years instead of just giving them unsecured loans

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

you raise interesting questions. how do you stop some asshole president from using infinite taxpayer money to manipulate the price of a stock?

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The same way SEC stops market markers from manipulating the stocks ;)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 2 points 1 day ago

I feel bad for laughing at this

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›